GUARD Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill defines elder financial fraud, general financial fraud, pig butchering, scams, and eligible federal grant funds. It permits law enforcement agencies and grantees to use listed federal grants for analysts, training, blockchain tools, data collection, tabletop exercises, and financial-sector liaisons. It requires grantee reports to grantmaking agencies, a one-year Treasury and FinCEN report on fraud efforts, a two-year national scams report estimating attempts, losses, overseas actors, organized crime, impersonation, synthetic identities, enforcement, and spending, and annual agency reports to banking, financial services, and judiciary committees.
Who Benefits and How
Elderly individuals benefit because law enforcement can use existing federal grant funds for elder financial fraud investigations, victim assistance, and specialized training. Adults with disabilities benefit because elder financial fraud is defined to include illegal use of the resources of an adult with a disability. State law enforcement agencies benefit from explicit permission to spend eligible grants on analysts, tools, training, and financial-sector liaisons. Local law enforcement agencies benefit from clearer authority to use existing grants for pig-butchering and complex financial fraud investigations. Tribal law enforcement agencies benefit from the same eligible grant-use authority and coordination tools. Financial institutions benefit from designated liaisons and tabletop exercises that improve information sharing with investigators.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Law enforcement grantees must report how grant funds were used, fraud statistics, outcomes, and investigative capacity effects. Treasury and FinCEN must produce reports on financial fraud, pig butchering, elder financial fraud, scams, enforcement, losses, overseas actors, organized crime, and spending. Federal grantmaking agencies must issue annual reports to multiple congressional committees using grantee information. Scammers and fraud networks face higher investigation risk from trained personnel, blockchain tools, data collection, and financial-sector coordination.
Key Provisions
- Defines elder financial fraud, eligible federal grant funds, general financial fraud, pig butchering, scams, and state coverage.
- Allows eligible federal grants to fund analysts, agents, experts, training, software, blockchain tools, data reporting, tabletop exercises, and financial-sector liaisons.
- Requires grantees using funds for these purposes to report fund amounts, uses, fraud statistics, and investigative-capacity effects.
- Requires Treasury and FinCEN reports on fraud efforts and the state of scams in the United States.
- Requires annual reports by grantmaking agencies to banking, financial services, and judiciary committees.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Allows existing federal grant funds to be used for state, local, and Tribal investigations of elder financial fraud, pig-butchering scams, and general financial fraud, and requires Treasury, FinCEN, law enforcement grantees, and grantmaking agencies to report fraud trends, grant uses, enforcement actions, and scam losses.
Key Policy Areas
Financial Services, Law Enforcement, Consumer Protection
Primary Purpose
Allows existing federal grant funds to be used for state, local, and Tribal investigations of elder financial fraud, pig-butchering scams, and general financial fraud, and requires Treasury, FinCEN, law enforcement grantees, and grantmaking agencies to report fraud trends, grant uses, enforcement actions, and scam losses.
Policy Domains
Bill provisions
Identified Gains
- Elderly individuals
- Adults with disabilities
- State law enforcement agencies
- Local law enforcement agencies
- Tribal law enforcement agencies
- Financial institutions
Identified Costs
- Law enforcement grantees
- Treasury Department
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
- Federal grantmaking agencies
- Scammers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedPlaced on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. …
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment …
Mrs. Britt (for herself, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. Scott of …
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate
Mrs. Britt (for herself, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Scott of Florida, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies, Tribal law enforcement agencies
Federal grantmaking agencies, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "fincen"
- → Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
- "secretary"
- → Secretary of the Treasury
- "attorney_general"
- → Attorney General
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology