S2379-119

Passed Senate

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 22, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act amends the State Justice Institute Act to support a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center. The center would give state and local courts technical assistance, training, threat monitoring, standardized reporting, and coordination with law enforcement around threats to judges and court staff.

The bill defines eligible organizations as national nonprofits with expertise in state and local judicial security, courthouse design, public access, court operations, and threat assessment. The State Justice Institute must also report annually to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees on threats to state and local judiciary members and court staff.

Who Benefits and How

State judges, local judges, court staff, courthouse security officials, judicial security nonprofits, local law enforcement agencies, and court administrators benefit from centralized threat intelligence, training, best practices, and coordination resources. Congressional judiciary committees benefit from annual data about threat volume, seriousness, and types.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The State Justice Institute must provide financial and technical support, oversee eligible organizations, and submit annual reports. Eligible judicial-security nonprofits must operate the center, train courts, maintain threat reporting systems, and coordinate with law enforcement. Public funds support the new monitoring, training, and reporting functions.

Key Provisions

  • Defines eligible judicial-security organizations.
  • Authorizes financial and technical support for a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center.
  • Requires training and technical assistance for judicial security.
  • Supports standardized threat reporting, data collection, and law-enforcement coordination.
  • Requires annual reports to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees on threats to judges and court staff.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center through the State Justice Institute to improve threat monitoring, training, reporting, and law-enforcement coordination for state and local judges and court staff.

Key Policy Areas

Judiciary, Public Safety, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Creates a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center through the State Justice Institute to improve threat monitoring, training, reporting, and law-enforcement coordination for state and local judges and court staff.

Policy Domains

Judiciary Public Safety Law Enforcement

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • State judges
  • Local judges
  • Court staff
  • Courthouse security officials
  • Judicial security nonprofits
  • Local law enforcement agencies
  • Congressional judiciary committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Court staff: , ,
Local judges: , ,
State judges: , ,
Judicial security nonprofits: , ,
Courthouse security officials: , ,
Local law enforcement agencies: , ,
Congressional judiciary committees: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State Justice Institute
  • Eligible judicial-security nonprofits
  • Public funders
  • Court administrators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Public funders: , ,
Court administrators: , ,
State Justice Institute: , ,
Eligible judicial-security nonprofits: , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 20, 2025

Received in the House.

Nov 20, 2025

Held at the desk.

Nov 20, 2025

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Nov 20, 2025

Received in the House.

Nov 20, 2025

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Nov 20, 2025

Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8398-8399; …

Jul 22, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Jul 22, 2025 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Jul 22, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Jul 22, 2025

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Moran, Mr. Hawley, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Congress, State Justice Institute

Positive-direction: Congress

Negative-direction: State Justice Institute

Nonprofits
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Judicial security nonprofits, National nonprofits specializing in judicial security

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Local law enforcement, State and local judges and court staff

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Judiciary Public Safety Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology