S2153-119

Introduced

To promote competition and reduce gatekeeper power in the app economy, increase choice, improve quality, and reduce costs for consumers.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 24, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Open App Markets Act targets large app store operators (primarily Apple and Google) that control both an app store with over 50 million US users and the underlying operating system. It prohibits these "covered companies" from requiring developers to use their in-app payment systems, restricting developers from communicating pricing offers to users, or giving preferential treatment to their own apps.

Who Benefits and How

Third-party app developers benefit significantly by gaining the ability to use alternative payment systems (avoiding 15-30% commission fees), offer different prices on other platforms, and distribute apps through alternative app stores. Consumers benefit from potentially lower prices, more app choices, and the ability to install third-party app stores and set default apps.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Apple and Google (as covered companies) face substantial new compliance requirements: they must allow competing app stores, cannot mandate their payment systems, must provide equal API access to competitors, and face treble damages for violations. They lose significant revenue from mandatory commission structures and face FTC/DOJ/State AG enforcement.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits covered companies from requiring developers to use their in-app payment systems
  • Requires operating systems to allow sideloading of third-party apps and app stores
  • Bans self-preferencing in app store search rankings and algorithms
  • Enables treble damages for injured developers plus state AG enforcement

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Regulates large app store operators (Apple, Google) to promote competition by prohibiting anti-competitive practices such as mandatory in-app payment systems, self-preferencing, and restrictions on third-party app distribution.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Competition Policy

Primary Purpose

Regulates large app store operators (Apple, Google) to promote competition by prohibiting anti-competitive practices such as mandatory in-app payment systems, self-preferencing, and restrictions on third-party app distribution.

Policy Domains

Technology Antitrust Consumer Protection Competition Policy

Open App Markets Act

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Third-party app developers
  • Alternative app stores (e.g., Epic Games Store)
  • Alternative payment processors
  • Consumers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Apple (iOS App Store)
  • Google (Google Play Store)
  • Other large app store operators meeting threshold
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 24, 2025

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Lee, Ms. Klobuchar, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
12 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive -7 negative

Alphabet Inc. (Google Play Store and Android operating system), Alphabet Inc. (Google Play Store), Alternative app store operators

Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc. (covered companies) faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Alternative app store operators, Intellectual property holders, Third-party app developers, Third-party app developers (e.g., Epic Games, Spotify)

Negative-direction: Alphabet Inc. (Google Play Store and Android operating system), Alphabet Inc. (Google Play Store), Apple Inc. (iOS App Store and iOS operating system), Apple Inc. (iOS App Store), Chinese technology companies (e.g., TikTok, Huawei)

Government
5 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative ?2 uncertain

DOJ Antitrust Division, Federal Trade Commission, Government Accountability Office

Consumers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Mobile device consumers

Payment Processing Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Alternative payment processors (e.g., Stripe, PayPal)

6/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Antitrust Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"ftc"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"state_ag"
→ State Attorneys General
"attorney_general"
→ U.S. Attorney General

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"app store" §app_store

A publicly available website, software application, or other electronic service that distributes apps from third-party developers to users

"covered company" §covered_company

Any person that owns or controls an app store with over 50,000,000 US monthly users AND the operating system on which that app store operates

"in-app payment system" §in_app_payment_system

An application, service, or user interface to manage billing or process payments from users of an app

"nonpublic business information" §nonpublic_business_info

Nonpublic data derived from a developer or app, including user interactions, collected by a covered company in the course of operating an app store

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology