S2142-119

In Committee

GOLDEN DOME Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jun 23, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

The GOLDEN DOME Act of 2025 creates a massive missile defense program to protect the United States from missile and drone attacks. It establishes a powerful new program manager position to oversee development of layered defenses spanning from the ocean floor to space. The bill authorizes over billion in spending for FY2026, covering everything from ground-based interceptors and space-based sensors to directed energy weapons and counter-drone systems. It also expands authorities for the military to deal with drone threats, requires competitive procurement in the space industrial base, and allows the Secretary of Defense to waive legal requirements to speed up construction and deployment.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a comprehensive next-generation missile defense architecture (Golden Dome) to defend the U.S. homeland against ballistic, cruise, hypersonic, and unmanned system threats from all adversaries, with B in authorized appropriations for FY2026.

Who Benefits

  • Defense contractors (missile systems, space, sensors, directed energy)
  • Space industry companies
  • AI/ML technology firms

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal budget (over B authorized for FY2026)
  • Environmental/regulatory interests (legal waiver authority)
  • Existing acquisition oversight bodies (bypassed by expedited authorities)

Key Policy Areas

{'domain': 'Defense', 'evidence': ['4', '7']}, {'domain': 'Technology', 'evidence': ['4', '5']}, {'domain': 'Foreign Affairs', 'evidence': ['4']}

Primary Purpose

Establishes a comprehensive next-generation missile defense architecture (Golden Dome) to defend the U.S. homeland against ballistic, cruise, hypersonic, and unmanned system threats from all adversaries, with B in authorized appropriations for FY2026.

Policy Domains

{'domain': 'Defense', 'evidence': ['4', '7']} {'domain': 'Technology', 'evidence': ['4', '5']} {'domain': 'Foreign Affairs', 'evidence': ['4']}

Legislative Strategy

"Create a centralized, fast-tracked missile defense program with extraordinary procurement authorities that bypass normal acquisition processes, leveraging commercial technology and allied cooperation."

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 23, 2025

Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following …

Jun 23, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Jun 23, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+8 positive -1 negative

Commercial technology providers, Counter-drone technology companies, Defense missile systems contractors

Positive-direction: Commercial technology providers, Counter-drone technology companies, Defense missile systems contractors, Department of Defense, Missile interceptor manufacturers, Radar and sensor modernization contractors, Space Force, U.S. homeland defense posture

Negative-direction: Dominant space prime contractors

Technology
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive -1 negative

AI and sensor technology firms, Multiple space defense vendors, Smaller space defense contractors

Positive-direction: AI and sensor technology firms, Multiple space defense vendors, Smaller space defense contractors, Space industry companies, Space-based sensor and satellite companies

Negative-direction: Space-as-a-service providers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of Defense acquisition oversight

Environment
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Environmental and regulatory compliance interests

Air Transport
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Commercial drone operators

Civil Liberties
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

FOIA requesters and transparency advocates

7/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense
Domains
Defense Technology
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense
"program_manager"
→ Golden Dome Direct Report Program Manager
Domains
Defense Technology
Actor Mappings
"head_of_agency"
→ Head of a federal agency
Domains
Defense Homeland Security
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense
Domains
Defense

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"" §3

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology