S2130-119

Reported

To make improvements to the AUKUS partnership, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 18, 2025

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 30, 2025

Reported by Mr. Risch, with an amendment

Jun 18, 2025

Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Coons, …

Jun 18, 2025

Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Coons, …

Summary

What This Bill Does

The AUKUS Improvement Act streamlines arms export controls between the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. It allows defense contractors and governments in these three countries to transfer military equipment and technology to each other without seeking Presidential approval for each transaction. The bill also eliminates requirements for companies to notify Congress when entering into manufacturing or technical assistance agreements with Australian and UK partners.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. defense contractors benefit significantly by facing fewer regulatory hurdles when exporting weapons and military technology to Australia and the UK. They no longer need to wait for Presidential consent for re-exports or transfers, and they avoid congressional certification requirements for licensing agreements. Major defense companies like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing stand to benefit from faster deal approvals and reduced compliance costs.

Australian and UK defense contractors also benefit by gaining easier access to U.S. military technology through simplified manufacturing licenses and technical assistance agreements. The governments of Australia and the UK benefit from streamlined procurement of American defense equipment to support the AUKUS security partnership.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Congressional oversight is significantly reduced. Under current law, Congress receives notifications when companies enter major technology transfer or manufacturing agreements. This bill eliminates those notifications for Australia and UK deals, reducing congressional visibility into which U.S. military technologies are being transferred abroad and to whom.

The U.S. State Department loses oversight authority as transfers between AUKUS partners no longer require Presidential consent, reducing the Department's ability to review and potentially block sensitive technology transfers for foreign policy or national security reasons.

Arms control advocates and transparency groups face reduced visibility into arms exports, as the elimination of certification and notification requirements makes it harder to track which military technologies are leaving U.S. control.

Key Provisions

  • Exempts defense article transfers between the U.S., Australia, and UK from requiring Presidential consent, allowing unlimited re-exports and temporary imports between AUKUS partners
  • Authorizes intra-company transfers of defense technology between employees of multinational defense firms, including dual nationals and third-country nationals who meet security requirements
  • Eliminates congressional certification requirements for Manufacturing License Agreements and Technical Assistance Agreements with Australia and the UK
  • Removes the UK from the list of NATO countries that require congressional notification for technology transfer agreements
  • Applies to both government-to-government transfers and transfers between eligible private defense contractors in the three countries
Model: claude-sonnet-4.5
Generated: Dec 25, 2025 20:13

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Streamlines arms export control requirements and eliminates certification requirements for defense article transfers between the United States, Australia, and United Kingdom under the AUKUS partnership.

Policy Domains

Defense Foreign Affairs International Trade Arms Control

Legislative Strategy

"Reduce bureaucratic barriers and expedite defense cooperation between AUKUS partners to strengthen collective defense capabilities"

Likely Beneficiaries

  • U.S. defense contractors exporting to Australia and UK
  • Australian and UK defense contractors
  • Australian and UK governments (easier procurement)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (streamlined partner cooperation)

Likely Burden Bearers

  • U.S. State Department (reduced oversight authority)
  • Arms control advocates (weakened export controls)
  • Congress (reduced visibility into transfers via eliminated certifications)

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Arms Control
Actor Mappings
"the_president"
→ President of the United States
Domains
Defense International Trade

Note: Bill is narrowly focused on AUKUS countries only - no ambiguous actor references

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"eligible entities" §section_2

Entities eligible under section 126.7(b)(2) of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations - refers to qualifying defense contractors and organizations in Australia and UK

"qualifying officers, employees, and agents" §section_2_officers

Officers, employees, and agents who satisfy section 120.64 of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, including dual or third country nationals who satisfy section 126.18

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology