S2041-119

In Committee

Information and Communications Technology and Services National Security Review Act

119th Congress Introduced Jun 11, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to add a new part establishing the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services framework with comprehensive definitions, defines key terms including covered transaction (transactions involving ICTS from jurisdictions of concern or Commerce Control List items), entity of concern (Entity List companies or those under arms embargo), and establishes the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services within the Bureau of Industry and Security, headed by an Executive Director who reports to the Assistant Secretary. It relies on compliance mandates, definition changes, reporting requirements, and exemptions. The main policy areas are Technology, National Security, and Trade.

Who Benefits and How

Secretary of Commerce (administrative burden reduction) could face lower compliance burdens, Congress (oversight committees) would be affected, and U.S. companies seeking categorical exclusions could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Violators of ICTS regulations could face higher costs, Individuals willfully violating the law could face increased risk, and Foreign technology suppliers from adversarial nations could face higher barriers.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to add a new part establishing the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services framework with comprehensive definitions.
  • Defines key terms including covered transaction (transactions involving ICTS from jurisdictions of concern or Commerce Control List items), entity of concern (Entity List companies or those under arms embargo)...
  • Establishes the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services within the Bureau of Industry and Security, headed by an Executive Director who reports to the Assistant Secretary.
  • Establishes transaction review process giving Secretary authority to review covered transactions suspected of posing undue risk.
  • Authorizes Secretary to promulgate regulations identifying covered transactions, entities, or jurisdictions warranting scrutiny; establishing mitigation measures including prohibitions; creating categorical...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to add a new part establishing the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services framework with comprehensive definitions, defines key terms including covered transaction (transactions involving ICTS from jurisdictions of concern or Commerce Control List items), entity of concern (Entity List companies or those under arms embargo), and establishes the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services within the Bureau of Industry and Security, headed by an Executive Director who reports to the Assistant Secretary.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, National Security, Trade

Primary Purpose

The bill amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to add a new part establishing the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services framework with comprehensive definitions, defines key terms including covered transaction (transactions involving ICTS from jurisdictions of concern or Commerce Control List items), entity of concern (Entity List companies or those under arms embargo), and establishes the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services within the Bureau of Industry and Security, headed by an Executive Director who reports to the Assistant Secretary.

Policy Domains

Technology National Security Trade

Full Bill - Information and Communications Technology and Services National Security Review Act

Identified Gains
  • Secretary of Commerce (administrative burden reduction)
  • Congress (oversight committees)
  • U.S. companies seeking categorical exclusions
  • Industry and academic experts on ICTS supply chains
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Congress (oversight committees):
U.S. companies seeking categorical exclusions:
Industry and academic experts on ICTS supply chains:
Secretary of Commerce (administrative burden reduction):
Identified Costs
  • Violators of ICTS regulations
  • Individuals willfully violating the law
  • Foreign technology suppliers from adversarial nations
  • Foreign technology companies from jurisdictions of concern
  • Entities from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Violators of ICTS regulations:
Individuals willfully violating the law:
Foreign technology suppliers from adversarial nations:
Foreign technology companies from jurisdictions of concern:
Entities from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 11, 2025

Ms. Slotkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Jun 11, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, …

Jun 11, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
14 mentions across 9 clauses
+2 positive -12 negative

Companies challenging ICTS decisions, Companies conducting prohibited transactions, Companies engaging in covered ICTS transactions

Positive-direction: Industry and academic experts on ICTS supply chains, U.S. companies seeking categorical exclusions

Negative-direction: Companies challenging ICTS decisions, Companies conducting prohibited transactions, Companies engaging in covered ICTS transactions, Companies on Entity List, Companies seeking transaction licenses, Companies subject to ICTS investigations, Foreign entities identified as high-risk, Foreign technology companies from jurisdictions of concern, Foreign technology suppliers from adversarial nations, Individuals willfully violating the law, Technology industry subject to ICTS reviews, Violators of ICTS regulations

Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative ?1 uncertain

CFIUS (preserved authority), Congress (oversight committees), D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

Positive-direction: Congress (oversight committees), Secretary of Commerce (administrative burden reduction)

Negative-direction: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Director of National Intelligence

Trade
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Entities from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Importers of restricted technology

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

U.S. companies sourcing technology components

11/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology National Security Trade
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of National Intelligence (for risk assessments)
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
"executive_director"
→ Executive Director of ICTS Office

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"covered transaction" §1785

A transaction conducted by any U.S. person or involving U.S. property that involves ICTS designed/manufactured by persons from jurisdictions of concern or items on the Commerce Control List

"entity of concern" §1785b

An entity owned or controlled by an entity on the Entity List or by a person subject to a country under comprehensive U.S. arms embargo

"jurisdiction of concern" §1785c

A foreign government or regime that has engaged in patterns of conduct contrary to U.S. national security, including Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology