S2010-119

Introduced

To require online service providers to disclose their acceptable use policies, provide users with written notice before the termination of a user’s account, and publish an annual report detailing actions taken to enforce their acceptable use policies, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 10, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

This bill requires online platforms that have user accounts to publicly disclose their content moderation policies, give users at least 7 days written notice before terminating or suspending their accounts, and publish annual transparency reports detailing their enforcement actions. Platforms must explain exactly what rule a user violated and provide an appeal process. Users can opt to have their termination notice made public. The FTC would enforce the law, treating violations as unfair or deceptive trade practices. Emergency exceptions allow immediate action for court orders, federal law compliance, or imminent safety risks.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires online service providers to publicly disclose acceptable use policies, give users advance written notice before account termination or suspension, and publish annual transparency reports on enforcement actions, with FTC enforcement authority.

Who Benefits

  • Online platform users facing account restrictions
  • Consumers seeking transparency about platform rules
  • Free speech advocates

Who Bears Costs

  • Major online service providers (compliance costs for notice, appeals, reporting)
  • Social media platforms
  • Small online service providers (proportional compliance burden)

Key Policy Areas

{'domain': 'Technology', 'evidence': 'Regulates online service providers that require user accounts, covering websites, online services, and applications engaged in interstate commerce'}, {'domain': 'Consumer Protection', 'evidence': 'Mandates disclosure of content moderation standards, advance notice before account restrictions, and appeal processes for users'}, {'domain': 'Government Operations', 'evidence': 'Grants FTC enforcement authority treating violations as unfair or deceptive practices, including authority over nonprofits'}

Primary Purpose

Requires online service providers to publicly disclose acceptable use policies, give users advance written notice before account termination or suspension, and publish annual transparency reports on enforcement actions, with FTC enforcement authority.

Policy Domains

{'domain': 'Technology', 'evidence': 'Regulates online service providers that require user accounts, covering websites, online services, and applications engaged in interstate commerce'} {'domain': 'Consumer Protection', 'evidence': 'Mandates disclosure of content moderation standards, advance notice before account restrictions, and appeal processes for users'} {'domain': 'Government Operations', 'evidence': 'Grants FTC enforcement authority treating violations as unfair or deceptive practices, including authority over nonprofits'}

Legislative Strategy

"Creates transparency and procedural due process requirements for content moderation without dictating what content platforms must allow or disallow, focusing on process rather than substance"

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 10, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Cotton, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
7 mentions across 5 clauses
-7 negative

Content moderation teams, Online service providers, Online service providers (social media, SaaS, e-commerce)

Consumers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Online platform users, Platform users, Platform users facing account restrictions

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Transparency and accountability researchers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal Trade Commission

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Nonprofit online service providers

6/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"online_service_provider"
→ Provider of public-facing website/service/app requiring user accounts
Domains
Consumer Protection Technology
Actor Mappings
"online_service_provider"
→ Online service providers
Domains
Consumer Protection Technology
Actor Mappings
"online_service_provider"
→ Online service providers
Domains
Technology Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"online_service_provider"
→ Online service providers
Domains
Government Operations Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"online service provider" §3(3)

Provider of a public-facing website, online service, or online application that requires unique accounts, provides internet-based products/services, and is engaged in interstate or foreign commerce

"restrict" §3(4)

Termination or suspension of a user account, or limitation of access, based on determination that user violated acceptable use policy

"user" §3(5)

Person who registers an account or creates a profile on an online service provider's platform

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology