S1979-118

Reported

To amend title 9 of the United States Code with respect to arbitration of disputes involving age discrimination.

118th Congress Introduced Jun 14, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill amends Title 9 of the United States Code to prohibit the enforcement of predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers in cases involving age discrimination against individuals 40 years of age or older. It gives the person alleging discrimination the right to choose whether to go to court or arbitration.

Who Benefits and How

Older workers (aged 40+) who face age discrimination benefit by gaining the right to pursue their claims in court rather than being forced into private arbitration. Trial lawyers and plaintiffs' attorneys benefit from increased litigation opportunities. Employee advocacy organizations benefit from stronger worker protections.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Employers who currently rely on mandatory arbitration clauses bear increased litigation costs and exposure to class action lawsuits. Arbitration service providers may see reduced business in age discrimination cases. Industries with older workforces face higher legal compliance risks.

Key Provisions

  • Adds Chapter 5 to Title 9 USC covering arbitration of age discrimination disputes
  • Defines age discrimination dispute as any claim of age-based discrimination for persons 40+, including disparate treatment, disparate impact, harassment, and retaliation
  • At the election of the claimant, predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers are unenforceable for age discrimination cases
  • Courts, not arbitrators, determine whether the chapter applies
  • Applies to disputes arising on or after the date of enactment

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits the enforcement of predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers in age discrimination disputes, allowing individuals aged 40 and older to pursue claims in court.

Key Policy Areas

Labor and Employment, Civil Rights, Judiciary

Primary Purpose

Prohibits the enforcement of predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers in age discrimination disputes, allowing individuals aged 40 and older to pursue claims in court.

Policy Domains

Labor and Employment Civil Rights Judiciary

Protecting Older Americans Act

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Workers aged 40+
  • Plaintiffs' attorneys
  • Employee advocacy groups
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Employers using mandatory arbitration
  • Arbitration service providers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 16, 2024

Reported by Mr. Durbin, without amendment

Jun 14, 2023

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Padilla, …

Jun 14, 2023

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Padilla, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Labor
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Workers aged 40+, Workers aged 40+ alleging discrimination

All Industries
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Employers using mandatory arbitration, Employers with arbitration agreements

Professional Services
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Arbitration service providers, Plaintiffs attorneys

Positive-direction: Plaintiffs attorneys

Negative-direction: Arbitration service providers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Courts and legal system, Federal and state courts

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Labor and Employment Civil Rights Judiciary

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Age discrimination dispute" §501

A dispute relating to conduct alleged to constitute age discrimination against a person 40+ years old, including disparate treatment, disparate impact, harassment, and retaliation, prohibited under Federal, Tribal, or State law.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology