S1883-119

Reported

DISRUPT Act

119th Congress Introduced May 22, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Directs a U.S. policy and interagency task forces to disrupt cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea in dangerous military, intelligence, sanctions-evasion, cyber, technology, and authoritarian tactics, with reports from State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, intelligence, and other agencies.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. national-security planners benefit from formal task forces and reports on how China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea cooperate. Allied governments benefit if U.S. strategy better disrupts adversary technology transfers, military support, sanctions evasion, cyber tools, and coercive tactics. Congressional defense, foreign-affairs, intelligence, banking, and commerce committees benefit from reporting on adversary partnerships and U.S. disruption options.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State Department sanctions staff, Defense policy staff, Treasury sanctions staff, Commerce export-control staff, intelligence analysts, and other agencies must form task forces and produce reports quickly. PRC, Russian, Iranian, and North Korean entities involved in dangerous cooperation face heightened monitoring and possible future sanctions, export controls, or diplomatic pressure. Companies that facilitate adversary cooperation may face more scrutiny.

Key Provisions

  • Provides findings on China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea as foreign adversary governments.
  • Establishes U.S. policy to disrupt dangerous cooperation among those governments.
  • Requires interagency task forces within 60 days.
  • Requires reports on dangerous cooperation, U.S. responses, and disruption options.
  • Involves State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, intelligence, and other executive-branch components.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Directs a U.S. policy and interagency task forces to disrupt cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea in dangerous military, intelligence, sanctions-evasion, cyber, technology, and authoritarian tactics, with reports from State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, intelligence, and other agencies.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Affairs, Sanctions, National Security

Primary Purpose

Directs a U.S. policy and interagency task forces to disrupt cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea in dangerous military, intelligence, sanctions-evasion, cyber, technology, and authoritarian tactics, with reports from State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, intelligence, and other agencies.

Policy Domains

Foreign Affairs Sanctions National Security

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • U.S. national-security planners
  • Allied governments
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Allied governments: , ,
U.S. national-security planners: , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State Department sanctions staff
  • Defense policy staff
  • Treasury sanctions staff
  • Commerce export-control staff
  • PRC entities
  • Russian entities
  • Iranian entities
  • North Korean entities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
PRC entities: , ,
Iranian entities: , ,
Russian entities: , ,
Defense policy staff: , ,
North Korean entities: , ,
Treasury sanctions staff: , ,
Commerce export-control staff: , ,
State Department sanctions staff: , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 18, 2025

Reported by Mr. Risch, with an amendment

Jun 18, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jun 18, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an …

Jun 5, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an …

May 22, 2025

Introduced in Senate

May 22, 2025

Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. McCormick) introduced the following …

May 22, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

May 22, 2025

Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. McCormick, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Cornyn, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Foreign Affairs
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -2 negative

Allied governments, State Department sanctions staff

Positive-direction: Allied governments

Negative-direction: State Department sanctions staff

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Congressional oversight committees

Iran
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Iranian entities

North Korea
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

North Korean entities

National Security
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

U.S. national-security planners

Defense
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Defense policy staff

China
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

PRC entities

Russia
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Russian entities

4/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Affairs Sanctions National Security
Actor Mappings
"secretary_state"
→ Secretary of State
"secretary_defense"
→ Secretary of Defense
"secretary_treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology