S1791-119

In Committee

Gunnison Outdoor Resources Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced May 15, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Gunnison Outdoor Resources Protection Act of 2025 establishes a comprehensive conservation framework for approximately 400,000 acres of federal land in Gunnison County, Colorado. It creates nine Special Management Areas, eight Wildlife Conservation Areas, four Protection Areas, two Recreation Management Areas, a Scientific Research and Education Area, and designates new wilderness areas and additions to existing wilderness. It also withdraws certain federal land in the North Fork Valley from oil and gas leasing and transfers approximately 19,080 acres into trust for the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.

Who Benefits and How

  • Conservation and environmental groups benefit from permanent protections on hundreds of thousands of acres, including restrictions on motorized vehicles, road construction, and commercial timber harvesting.
  • Outdoor recreation enthusiasts (hikers, skiers, cyclists) benefit from designated recreation management areas and preserved trail corridors, including the Gunnison to Crested Butte Trail and others.
  • The Ute Mountain Ute Tribe gains approximately 19,080 acres of fee-owned land placed into federal trust as part of their reservation, though gaming activities are explicitly prohibited on this land.
  • Scientific researchers and educational institutions, particularly the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, benefit from a dedicated 12,250-acre Scientific Research and Education Area.
  • Ranchers with existing grazing permits are protected because existing grazing laws and regulations continue to apply within covered areas.
  • Wildlife species, particularly the Gunnison sage-grouse, benefit from designated conservation areas and mandated seasonal closures for off-highway vehicles.

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Oil and gas companies lose access to federal mineral leasing in the North Fork Valley withdrawal area and face no-surface-occupancy restrictions on additional land in Delta County.
  • Mining companies lose access to mineral exploration and development across all covered areas and wilderness designations, which are withdrawn from the mining laws.
  • Off-highway vehicle users face restrictions limiting use to roads and trails designated as of the date of enactment, with new seasonal closures mandated in several areas.
  • Timber industry is prohibited from commercial timber harvesting in all covered areas; vegetation management is limited to small-diameter trees and biomass.
  • The U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management take on new management responsibilities, including developing winter travel management plans within 3 years and conducting wet meadow and riparian restoration projects.

Key Provisions

  • Designates 9 Special Management Areas totaling approximately 214,650 acres with restrictions on motorized vehicles and development
  • Designates 8 Wildlife Conservation Areas totaling approximately 223,865 acres focused on wildlife habitat protection
  • Creates new wilderness areas and additions totaling approximately 124,898 acres under the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993
  • Withdraws North Fork Valley federal land from oil and gas mineral leasing
  • Transfers approximately 19,080 acres of Ute Mountain Ute Tribe fee land into federal trust (gaming prohibited)
  • Prohibits commercial timber harvesting and new permanent road construction in all covered areas

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Designates approximately 400,000 acres of federal land in Gunnison County, Colorado as special management areas, wildlife conservation areas, protection areas, recreation management areas, wilderness areas, and a scientific research area, while also withdrawing certain North Fork Valley lands from oil and gas leasing and transferring land into trust for the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Environment, Natural Resources, Wildlife, Energy, Tribal Affairs

Primary Purpose

Designates approximately 400,000 acres of federal land in Gunnison County, Colorado as special management areas, wildlife conservation areas, protection areas, recreation management areas, wilderness areas, and a scientific research area, while also withdrawing certain North Fork Valley lands from oil and gas leasing and transferring land into trust for the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Environment Natural Resources Wildlife Energy Tribal Affairs

Gunnison Outdoor Resources Protection Act of 2025

Identified Gains
  • Conservation and environmental organizations
  • Outdoor recreation industry (hiking, skiing, cycling)
  • Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
  • Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
  • Ranchers with existing grazing permits
  • Gunnison sage-grouse and wildlife
  • Gunnison County tourism economy
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe:
Gunnison County tourism economy: ,
Gunnison sage-grouse and wildlife: ,
Ranchers with existing grazing permits:
Conservation and environmental organizations: , , ,
Outdoor recreation industry (hiking, skiing, cycling): ,
Identified Costs
  • Oil and gas companies
  • Mining companies
  • Off-highway vehicle users
  • Timber industry
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Bureau of Land Management
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Timber industry:
Mining companies:
U.S. Forest Service: , , ,
Oil and gas companies:
Bureau of Land Management: , , ,
Off-highway vehicle users: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 15, 2025

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Hickenlooper) introduced the following …

May 15, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and …

May 15, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Recreation & Tourism
9 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -5 negative

Backcountry hikers and non-motorized recreation, Grand Traverse skiing event organizers, Motorized recreation vehicle users and operators

Positive-direction: Backcountry hikers and non-motorized recreation, Grand Traverse skiing event organizers, Outdoor recreation industry (hiking, cycling, trail-based tourism), Outdoor recreation industry (hiking, skiing, cycling)

Negative-direction: Motorized recreation vehicle users and operators, Off-highway vehicle users, Off-highway vehicle users and recreational motorized vehicle industry, Snowmobile operators

Government
7 mentions across 4 clauses
-7 negative

Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management

Environment
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

Conservation and environmental organizations, Conservation and wilderness preservation organizations, Conservation and wildlife organizations

Mining
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Coal mine operators (methane capture exemption), Mining companies seeking mineral exploration and extraction, Mining companies seeking mineral exploration on federal land

Positive-direction: Coal mine operators (methane capture exemption)

Negative-direction: Mining companies seeking mineral exploration and extraction, Mining companies seeking mineral exploration on federal land

Agriculture
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

North Fork Valley watershed communities and agricultural interests, Ranchers with existing federal grazing permits

Tribal Nations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Indian Tribes with treaty rights in the area, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe

Fishing & Forestry
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Commercial timber harvesting companies, Timber harvesting companies

Oil & Gas
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Oil and gas exploration and production companies

8/11
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Environment Natural Resources Wildlife Energy Tribal Affairs
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Agriculture (via Forest Service Chief) for National Forest System land; Secretary of the Interior for BLM land

Note: The Secretary refers to either the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) or Secretary of the Interior (BLM) depending on the land jurisdiction, as defined in Section 2.

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

7 terms
"collaboratively developed" §2

A project developed through a collaborative process with multiple diverse stakeholders that is transparent and nonexclusive, or meets resource advisory committee requirements.

"County" §2_county

Gunnison County, Colorado.

"Secretary" §2_secretary

Secretary of Agriculture (via Forest Service Chief) for National Forest System land; Secretary of the Interior for BLM land.

"covered area" §2_covered_area

Each of the Special Management Areas, Wildlife Conservation Areas, Protection Areas, Recreation Management Areas, and the Scientific Research and Education Area.

"decommission" §2_decommission

Reestablish native vegetation, restore drainage and watershed function, block vehicular traffic, and implement invasive species monitoring on a road.

"winter travel management plan" §2_winter_travel_plan

A decision designating roads, trails, or areas for over-snow vehicle use under applicable Forest Service or BLM regulations.

"wildland-urban interface" §2_wildland_urban_interface

Land within a covered area within 1/4 mile of interface/intermix areas mapped in the USDA 2010 Wildland-Urban Interface publication.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology