S1745-119

In Committee

Dismantling Ideological Policies for Semiconductors and Science Act

119th Congress Introduced May 13, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill removes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements that were enacted as part of the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. It repeals provisions requiring consideration of underrepresented groups in semiconductor workforce programs, STEM education initiatives, and research funding. Additionally, it prohibits federal agencies from imposing DEI-related mandates on companies and organizations seeking federal funds.

Who Benefits and How

Companies seeking federal semiconductor/research funding benefit by no longer needing to demonstrate DEI commitments, workforce diversity plans, or community investment strategies to receive CHIPS Act incentives. Federal agencies gain flexibility in funding decisions without DEI-based requirements. Traditional STEM institutions may benefit from simplified application processes without diversity partnership requirements.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Minority-serving institutions (HBCUs, Tribal Colleges) lose explicit partnership requirements and targeted outreach provisions. Underrepresented groups in STEM (women, minorities, economically disadvantaged individuals) lose dedicated programs and requirements for their inclusion. Communities near semiconductor facilities lose requirements for companies to plan for environmental justice, affordable housing, and transportation services.

Key Provisions

  • Repeals CHIPS Act section 104 requiring opportunity and inclusion plans for semiconductor incentive recipients
  • Removes DEI research funding programs at NSF (Section 10328)
  • Prohibits agencies from requiring workforce diversity plans, childcare policies, or community investment plans as conditions for federal funding
  • Modifies NSF fellowship programs to prioritize U.S. citizens and domestic workforce growth over diversity considerations

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Repeals diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements from the CHIPS and Science Act and prohibits federal agencies from imposing DEI-related mandates on entities seeking federal funds.

Key Policy Areas

Science & Technology, Education, Federal Contracting, Workforce Development

Primary Purpose

Repeals diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements from the CHIPS and Science Act and prohibits federal agencies from imposing DEI-related mandates on entities seeking federal funds.

Policy Domains

Science & Technology Education Federal Contracting Workforce Development

Title I - Amendments to CHIPS Act and Research and Development Act

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Semiconductor companies
  • Large research universities
  • Traditional STEM institutions
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Historically Black Colleges and Universities
  • Tribal Colleges and Universities
  • Underrepresented groups in STEM
  • Economically disadvantaged students
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Title II - Limitation on Federal Mandates

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Federal contractors
  • Companies seeking CHIPS Act funding
  • Research institutions
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Workers seeking childcare benefits
  • Communities near semiconductor facilities
  • Environmental justice communities
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 13, 2025

Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, and Mr. Ricketts) introduced …

May 13, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, …

May 13, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Educational Services
8 mentions across 5 clauses
+2 positive -6 negative

DEI researchers and programs at universities, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, International students in STEM programs

Positive-direction: U.S. citizens and permanent residents seeking STEM education, Universities participating in microelectronics education network

Negative-direction: DEI researchers and programs at universities, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, International students in STEM programs, Tribal Colleges and Universities, Underrepresented educators seeking STEM teaching positions, Underrepresented students in STEM education

Government
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Federal agencies subject to reporting requirement, Foundation for Energy Security and Innovation, NASA and aviation research programs

Manufacturing
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Semiconductor companies seeking federal incentives, Semiconductor manufacturers receiving CHIPS Act incentives, Underrepresented workers in semiconductor industry

Positive-direction: Semiconductor manufacturers receiving CHIPS Act incentives

Negative-direction: Underrepresented workers in semiconductor industry

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Underrepresented groups in aviation research

Government Contractors
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Companies and organizations seeking federal funding

All Industries
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Workers benefiting from employer childcare policies

Rural Communities
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Environmental justice communities

Utilities
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Underrepresented groups in energy sector

12/25
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Science & Technology
Domains
Science & Technology Education Workforce Development
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of the National Science Foundation
Domains
Federal Contracting Workforce Development
Actor Mappings
"head_of_agency"
→ Head of any executive branch agency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"DEI" §section_2_dei

Diversity, equity, and inclusion - programs, initiatives, and other activities that allow preferential treatment based on race, color, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation

"STEM" §section_2_stem

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

"agency" §section_201_agency

An establishment in the executive branch of the Federal Government

"nonstatutory mandate" §section_201_mandate

A requirement that is not specified in Federal statute and is established by an agency

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology