S1654-119

Introduced

To require transportation network companies to provide customers notice when a driver has a camera in their motor vehicle and provide customers an opportunity to opt out of riding in motor vehicles with cameras, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced May 7, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Safe and Private Rides Act requires ride-sharing companies like Uber and Lyft to tell passengers when their driver has a camera that records video in the car. Passengers must be given a clear choice to refuse rides in camera-equipped vehicles, and drivers must register any in-car cameras with their ride-sharing company.

Who Benefits and How

Ride-sharing passengers gain new privacy protections: they must receive prominent in-app notifications about driver cameras and can easily opt out of recorded rides. Privacy advocates benefit from stricter surveillance disclosure rules in the gig economy. The Federal Trade Commission receives enforcement authority over these new requirements, allowing it to penalize companies that fail to comply.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Transportation network companies (Uber, Lyft, and similar services) must build new systems to register driver cameras, notify passengers, process opt-out requests, and establish violation reporting mechanisms. Drivers with in-car cameras must register them with their company and may lose some ride opportunities from opt-out passengers. Companies also face new restrictions on storing and sharing passenger recordings, limiting their use to criminal reports, insurance matters, or terms-of-service compliance.

Key Provisions

  • Drivers must register any passenger-recording cameras with their ride-sharing company
  • Passengers must receive clear, prominent in-app notification when matched with a driver who has a camera
  • Passengers can opt out of camera-equipped rides through an accessible in-app setting, separate from general terms of service
  • Companies cannot retain or share recordings except for criminal reporting, insurance purposes, or terms-of-service compliance
  • Passengers can report drivers who record without notification or who were matched despite opt-out preferences
  • Violations are treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices enforced by the FTC with standard penalties
  • Requirements take effect 180 days after enactment

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires transportation network companies (TNCs) to notify passengers when drivers have cameras recording them and provide an opt-out mechanism

Who Benefits

  • Ride-sharing passengers concerned about privacy
  • Privacy advocacy groups
  • Federal Trade Commission (expanded enforcement authority)

Who Bears Costs

  • Transportation network companies (Uber, Lyft, etc.) - new compliance costs
  • TNC drivers using cameras - registration requirements
  • App developers - system changes for notifications and opt-out mechanisms

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Protection, Privacy Rights, Transportation, Technology Regulation

Primary Purpose

Requires transportation network companies (TNCs) to notify passengers when drivers have cameras recording them and provide an opt-out mechanism

Policy Domains

Consumer Protection Privacy Rights Transportation Technology Regulation

Legislative Strategy

"Increase consumer privacy protections and transparency in ride-sharing services by mandating disclosure and opt-out rights for in-vehicle camera surveillance"

Identified Gains

  • Ride-sharing passengers concerned about privacy
  • Privacy advocacy groups
  • Federal Trade Commission (expanded enforcement authority)

Identified Costs

  • Transportation network companies (Uber, Lyft, etc.) - new compliance costs
  • TNC drivers using cameras - registration requirements
  • App developers - system changes for notifications and opt-out mechanisms

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 7, 2025

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Transportation network companies (Uber, Lyft, etc.)

Labor
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Rideshare drivers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Rideshare passengers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Protection Privacy Rights Transportation
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"Commission" §6(a)

The Federal Trade Commission

"motor vehicle" §6(b)

Any vehicle which is manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways (not including a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail or rails) and which has at least 4 wheels

"transportation network company" §6(c)

Any entity that uses a digital network to connect a customer to a driver affiliated with the company in order for the driver to provide transportation services using a motor vehicle to the customer. Does not include shared-expense carpool/vanpool not for profit, or microtransit/dedicated services for government/nonprofit/commercial entities

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology