To designate Ansarallah as a foreign terrorist organization and impose certain sanctions on Ansarallah, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill reduces a reporting req provision: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: It was reported by Reuters on March 21, 2017, that Iran, a designated state sponsor of terror, sent advanced weapons and military advisers and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, trade restriction provision: 3. It relies on reporting requirements, compliance mandates, and trade restrictions. The main policy areas are Defense and Transportation.
Who Benefits and How
The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Reduces a reporting req provision: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: It was reported by Reuters on March 21, 2017, that Iran, a designated state sponsor of terror, sent advanced weapons and military advisers...
- Adds or tightens a compliance mandate, trade restriction provision: 3.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill reduces a reporting req provision: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: It was reported by Reuters on March 21, 2017, that Iran, a designated state sponsor of terror, sent advanced weapons and military advisers and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, trade restriction provision: 3.
Key Policy Areas
Defense, Transportation
Primary Purpose
The bill reduces a reporting req provision: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: It was reported by Reuters on March 21, 2017, that Iran, a designated state sponsor of terror, sent advanced weapons and military advisers and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, trade restriction provision: 3.
Policy Domains
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Sheehy, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_secretary"
- → The Secretary identified in the operative section
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology