S1471-118

Introduced

To bolster the AUKUS partnership, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced May 4, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill, known as the TORPEDO Act (Truncating Onerous Regulations for Partners and Enhancing Deterrence Operations), removes regulatory barriers to defense trade with Australia and the United Kingdom under the AUKUS security partnership. It exempts these allies from certain arms export licensing requirements, creates open general licenses for defense article transfers, and expedites military technology sales.

Who Benefits and How

U.S., Australian, and UK defense contractors benefit significantly through reduced export licensing requirements and faster approvals, enabling quicker sales and technology transfers. The Department of Defense gains enhanced cooperation on submarine development, hypersonic missiles, AI, and quantum technologies. Australia specifically benefits by gaining access to U.S. Virginia-class submarines and nuclear propulsion technology.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The State Department must appoint a senior AUKUS advisor and restructure export control processes, increasing administrative workload. China, Russia, and other adversaries face increased deterrence as AUKUS partners strengthen military capabilities. Traditional defense export control advocates may view reduced oversight as a national security risk.

Key Provisions

  • Exempts Australia and UK from Arms Export Control Act licensing requirements (similar to existing Canada exemption)
  • Creates Open General License for defense articles between U.S., Australia, UK, and Canada
  • Expedites Foreign Military Sales processing for AUKUS partners
  • Requires biennial review of U.S. Munitions List to modernize export controls

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Streamlines U.S. defense export controls and regulatory processes to accelerate technology sharing with AUKUS partners (Australia and United Kingdom) for defense cooperation

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Foreign Policy, Trade

Primary Purpose

Streamlines U.S. defense export controls and regulatory processes to accelerate technology sharing with AUKUS partners (Australia and United Kingdom) for defense cooperation

Policy Domains

Defense Foreign Policy Trade

Title I - AUKUS Export Control Reforms

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • U.S. defense contractors
  • Australian defense industry
  • UK defense industry
  • Department of Defense
  • Royal Australian Navy
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • State Department export control staff
  • China/Russia (strategic adversaries)
  • Export control oversight advocates
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 4, 2023

Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Hagerty) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
13 mentions across 8 clauses
+6 positive -7 negative

Australia, UK, Canada seeking U.S. military equipment, Congressional defense committees, Congressional oversight committees

Positive-direction: Australia, UK, Canada seeking U.S. military equipment, Congressional defense committees, Congressional oversight committees, Department of Defense procurement, Royal Australian Navy, State Department Directorate of Defense Trade Controls

Negative-direction: Defense Department, Department of Defense, State Department, State Department defense trade control staff, State Department export control staff, State and Defense department FMS staff

Defense
12 mentions across 8 clauses
+11 positive ?1 uncertain

Australian Community defense companies, Canadian defense companies, Defense contractors

Shipbuilding
3 mentions across 1 clause
+3 positive

Australian private sector nuclear submarine workforce, Australian submarine industrial base companies, U.S. submarine contractors (training providers)

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Australian, UK, and Canadian tech companies, U.S. dual-use technology exporters

13/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Foreign Policy Trade
Actor Mappings
"the_president"
→ President of the United States
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State (for export controls), Secretary of Defense (for military cooperation)

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"AUKUS partnership" §2

The trilateral security partnership between the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia with two pillars: Pillar One focuses on Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines; Pillar Two focuses on advanced defense capabilities including hypersonics, quantum, AI, and undersea tech

"AUKUS partner" §2_aukus_partner

A member of the AUKUS partnership (US, UK, or Australia)

"defense article/defense service" §2_defense_article

As defined in section 47 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794)

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology