S1349-119

In Committee

Ruby Mountains Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill withdraws specified federal lands in Nevada from operation under the mineral leasing laws. It covers roughly 309,272 acres in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and about 39,926 acres in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, while preserving valid existing rights and a narrow refuge-management exception.

Who Benefits and How

Conservation interests, wildlife-protection advocates, and recreation users benefit because the bill blocks new mineral leasing on large protected landscapes. Refuge managers also retain flexibility for noncommercial management activities despite the withdrawal.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Oil, gas, geothermal, and other mineral leasing interests bear the burden because the bill removes future leasing opportunities on the withdrawn lands. The Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service must administer and monitor the withdrawal boundaries and exceptions.

Key Provisions

  • Withdraws specified National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains from mineral leasing laws
  • Withdraws specified Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge land from mineral leasing laws
  • Preserves valid existing rights
  • Allows noncommercial refuge management activities to continue despite the refuge withdrawal

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Withdraws large areas of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains and land in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge from operation under the mineral leasing laws.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Conservation, Mining

Primary Purpose

Withdraws large areas of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains and land in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge from operation under the mineral leasing laws.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Conservation Mining

Sections 2-3 - Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake withdrawals

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Conservation interests and recreation users in the Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake areas
  • Wildlife habitat protected by the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Mineral leasing interests seeking rights in the withdrawn areas
  • Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service officials administering the withdrawals
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 12, 2026

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, …

Apr 8, 2025

Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen) introduced the …

Apr 8, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and …

Apr 8, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Mining
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Mineral leasing interests seeking rights in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Mineral leasing interests seeking rights in the Ruby Mountains National Forest lands

General Public
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Conservation interests and recreation users in the Ruby Mountains, Wildlife habitat and conservation interests in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Fish and Wildlife Service officials administering the refuge withdrawal and management exception, Forest Service officials administering the mineral-withdrawal boundary

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Conservation Mining
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary_of_agriculture"
→ Secretary of Agriculture acting through the Forest Service
"the_secretary_of_the_interior"
→ Secretary of the Interior acting through the Fish and Wildlife Service

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology