S1325-119

Introduced

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a fee on certain products imported into the United States based on the pollution intensity associated with the production of such products, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Foreign Pollution Fee Act imposes tariffs on imported products based on how much pollution was generated during their manufacturing compared to equivalent U.S.-made products. Products from countries with weaker environmental standards face higher fees. The bill specifically targets countries like China (200% fees on many products), Russia, and Vietnam, while establishing lower fees for allies like Canada, Japan, and EU countries.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. manufacturers benefit significantly, as competing foreign products become more expensive due to the pollution fees. American steel, aluminum, cement, glass, fertilizer, and solar panel producers gain a competitive advantage. Carbon capture and removal companies benefit from provisions that allow pollution intensity reductions for verified carbon sequestration. Countries that sign international partnership agreements can negotiate reduced fees.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Foreign manufacturers, especially from China, Russia, Vietnam, and other high-emission countries, face substantial import fees ranging from 25% to 200% of product value. U.S. importers must pay these fees and comply with extensive supply chain traceability requirements. Consumers may face higher prices on imported goods. Products from "nonmarket economy countries" or "foreign entities of concern" face doubled or quadrupled fees.

Key Provisions

  • Creates variable pollution fees based on country-specific emission intensity tables, with rates from 0% to 200%
  • Establishes an Advisory Committee to calculate baseline pollution intensities for U.S. and foreign production
  • Allows countries to provide verifiable data to establish alternative pollution intensities
  • Doubles fees for nonmarket economies and products from foreign entities of concern
  • Creates international partnership agreements to reduce fees for compliant allies

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Imposes an ad valorem fee (tariff) on imported products based on the pollution intensity of their production compared to U.S. production standards, targeting countries with weaker environmental regulations.

Key Policy Areas

Trade, Environment, Energy, Manufacturing, Taxation

Primary Purpose

Imposes an ad valorem fee (tariff) on imported products based on the pollution intensity of their production compared to U.S. production standards, targeting countries with weaker environmental regulations.

Policy Domains

Trade Environment Energy Manufacturing Taxation

Title I - Foreign Pollution Fee

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • U.S. steel manufacturers
  • U.S. aluminum producers
  • U.S. cement manufacturers
  • U.S. fertilizer producers
  • U.S. glass manufacturers
  • U.S. solar panel producers
  • Carbon capture companies
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Chinese manufacturers
  • Foreign importers
  • U.S. importers of covered products
  • Nonmarket economy country exporters
  • Foreign entities of concern
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 8, 2025

Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
32 mentions across 10 clauses
+19 positive -13 negative

Chinese manufacturers, Chinese manufacturers of steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizer, glass, solar products, and batteries, Foreign aluminum producers

Positive-direction: Foreign facilities in free trade agreement countries, Industrial sector representatives (steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizer, glass), Low-income and lower-middle-income country manufacturers, Low-income country manufacturers, Lower-middle-income country manufacturers, Manufacturers in international partnership agreement countries, U.S. aluminum producers, U.S. cement manufacturers, U.S. companies with foreign manufacturing facilities, U.S. domestic aluminum manufacturers, U.S. domestic manufacturers, U.S. domestic manufacturers of covered products, U.S. domestic solar manufacturers, U.S. domestic steel manufacturers, U.S. fertilizer producers, U.S. manufacturers, U.S. steel and aluminum manufacturers, U.S. steel producers

Negative-direction: Chinese manufacturers, Chinese manufacturers of steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizer, glass, solar products, and batteries, Foreign aluminum producers, Foreign battery input manufacturers, Foreign cement producers, Foreign fertilizer producers, Foreign glass producers, Foreign manufacturers exporting to U.S., Foreign manufacturers exporting to the U.S., Foreign solar product manufacturers, Foreign steel producers, Russian manufacturers of covered products, Vietnamese manufacturers of covered products

Government
16 mentions across 10 clauses
-14 negative ?2 uncertain

Congress, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Treasury

Trade
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

Importers of covered products, U.S. importers from partner countries, U.S. importers of covered products

Positive-direction: U.S. importers from partner countries

Negative-direction: Importers of covered products, U.S. importers of covered products

Foreign Entities
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Countries with strong environmental standards (e.g., EU, Canada, Japan), Countries with unverifiable emission data, Countries with verifiable low-emission production

Positive-direction: Countries with strong environmental standards (e.g., EU, Canada, Japan), Countries with verifiable low-emission production

Negative-direction: Countries with unverifiable emission data, Nonmarket economy countries (e.g., China)

Research & Science
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Greenhouse gas accounting researchers, National Laboratories

Carbon Capture
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Carbon capture and sequestration companies

Recycling
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Recycled materials producers

16/18
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade Environment Taxation
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

6 terms
"covered product" §4696

Articles in categories including aluminum, steel, cement, fertilizer, glass, hydrogen, solar products, and battery inputs classified by HTS codes

"baseline pollution intensity" §4691(4)

The pollution intensity associated with production of a covered product in the United States

"country of origin" §4691(7)

For steel, where melted and poured; for aluminum, where smelted and cast; for others, where produced or last substantially transformed

"foreign entity of concern" §4691(10)

As defined in Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act section 40207(a)(5)

"nonmarket economy country" §4691(15)

Foreign country determined by Commerce Secretary to not operate on market principles of cost or pricing structures

"pollution intensity" §4691(17)

Amount of pollution in metric tons of CO2 equivalent emitted in production of a metric ton of a covered product

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology