To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to provide for security of tenure for use of mining claims for ancillary activities, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires use of mining claims for ancillary activities Section 10101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, reporting requirements, compliance mandates, and exemptions. The main policy areas are Natural Gas and Energy.
Who Benefits and How
Natural gas companies and customers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens and Electric utilities and power customers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face increased risk.
Key Provisions
- Requires use of mining claims for ancillary activities Section 10101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires use of mining claims for ancillary activities Section 10101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Natural Gas, Energy
Primary Purpose
The bill requires use of mining claims for ancillary activities Section 10101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Natural gas companies and customers affected by the bill
- Electric utilities and power customers affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Cortez Masto (for herself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Ms. …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology