To withdraw normal trade relations treatment from, and apply certain provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 to, products of the People’s Republic of China, and to expand the eligibility requirements for products of the People's Republic of China to receive normal trade relations treatment in the future, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates expansion of bases of ineligibility of People's Republic of China for normal trade relations Section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, appropriations, grants, and reporting requirements. The main policy areas are Education.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could see lower costs.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Educational institutions and students affected by the bill could lose revenue opportunities.
Key Provisions
- Creates expansion of bases of ineligibility of People's Republic of China for normal trade relations Section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates expansion of bases of ineligibility of People's Republic of China for normal trade relations Section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Education
Primary Purpose
The bill creates expansion of bases of ineligibility of People's Republic of China for normal trade relations Section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Budd, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology