To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to require the provision of training and information to certain personnel relating to food allergy identification and response, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill provides food allergy training completion requirement Section 7(g)(2) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C and provides activities to support WIC-eligible individuals impacted by food allergies Section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. It relies on appropriations, reporting requirements, compliance mandates, and product standards. The main policy areas are Education.
Who Benefits and How
Educational institutions and students affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities and Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Provides food allergy training completion requirement Section 7(g)(2) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.
- Provides activities to support WIC-eligible individuals impacted by food allergies Section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill provides food allergy training completion requirement Section 7(g)(2) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C and provides activities to support WIC-eligible individuals impacted by food allergies Section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Education
Primary Purpose
The bill provides food allergy training completion requirement Section 7(g)(2) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C and provides activities to support WIC-eligible individuals impacted by food allergies Section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Durbin (for himself and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology