S1128-119

Introduced

To prohibit any direct or indirect United States funding for the territory of Gaza unless certain conditions are met.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 25, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: 2. Restriction on the expenditure for Federal funds in Gaza No United States Government funds may be obligated or expended in the territory of Gaza until after. The main policy areas are Government Operations, Foreign Policy, and Immigration.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: 2. Restriction on the expenditure for Federal funds in Gaza No United States Government funds may be obligated or expended in the territory of Gaza until after...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: 2. Restriction on the expenditure for Federal funds in Gaza No United States Government funds may be obligated or expended in the territory of Gaza until after.

Key Policy Areas

Government Operations, Foreign Policy, Immigration

Primary Purpose

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: 2. Restriction on the expenditure for Federal funds in Gaza No United States Government funds may be obligated or expended in the territory of Gaza until after.

Policy Domains

Government Operations Foreign Policy Immigration

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 25, 2025

Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cruz, …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Operations Foreign Policy Immigration
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ The Secretary identified in the operative section

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology