S1115-119

Introduced

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide more effective remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 25, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Paycheck Fairness Act strengthens federal laws against pay discrimination based on sex. It makes it harder for employers to justify paying women less than men for the same work by requiring any pay differences to be based on job-related factors like education, training, or experience. The bill also requires large employers to report detailed pay data broken down by sex, race, and ethnicity.

Who Benefits and How

Workers (especially women) benefit through: stronger legal protections against pay discrimination; the right to discuss wages without retaliation; protection from being judged on salary history when applying for jobs; access to class action lawsuits with enhanced damages (including punitive damages). Plaintiffs' attorneys benefit from explicit authorization of attorney fee recovery and class action procedures.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Employers with 100+ employees must collect and report detailed compensation data disaggregated by sex, race, ethnicity, and job category to the EEOC. All covered employers face new compliance requirements including: prohibition on asking about salary history; prohibition on requiring employees to keep wages secret; higher penalties for violations ($5,000-$10,000 civil penalties plus up to $10,000 in special damages per violation). Federal contractors face enhanced oversight and data collection requirements.

Key Provisions

  • Requires employers to prove pay differences are based on bona fide job-related factors, not sex
  • Prohibits employers from asking about or relying on salary history when hiring
  • Mandates EEOC collection of pay data from employers with 100+ employees
  • Allows class action lawsuits for pay discrimination with compensatory and punitive damages
  • Protects employees who discuss or disclose their wages from retaliation

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Strengthens the Equal Pay Act of 1963 to close the gender wage gap by enhancing enforcement mechanisms, increasing penalties, prohibiting salary history inquiries, requiring pay data collection, and providing training programs.

Key Policy Areas

Labor, Civil Rights, Employment

Primary Purpose

Strengthens the Equal Pay Act of 1963 to close the gender wage gap by enhancing enforcement mechanisms, increasing penalties, prohibiting salary history inquiries, requiring pay data collection, and providing training programs.

Policy Domains

Labor Civil Rights Employment

Main Act - Paycheck Fairness Act

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Female workers
  • Workers facing pay discrimination
  • Plaintiffs attorneys
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • Department of Labor
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Private employers with 100+ employees
  • Federal contractors
  • All employers covered by Fair Labor Standards Act
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 25, 2025

Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Alsobrooks, Ms. Baldwin, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
8 mentions across 5 clauses
+1 positive ?7 uncertain

Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Business
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+1 positive -4 negative

Employers covered by Fair Labor Standards Act, Employers engaged in interstate commerce, Employers proactively addressing pay equity

Positive-direction: Employers proactively addressing pay equity

Negative-direction: Employers covered by Fair Labor Standards Act, Employers engaged in interstate commerce, Private employers with 100 or more employees

Labor
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive ?1 uncertain

Female workers experiencing pay discrimination, Job applicants with prior low wages, Prospective employees

Government Contractors
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Federal contractors (non-construction), Federal contractors and subcontractors

Employment Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Background check and employment verification companies

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Employers and employees

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Nonprofit organizations providing workforce training

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State and local educational agencies

13/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Labor Civil Rights Employment
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Labor
"the_commission"
→ Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
"the_commissioner"
→ Commissioner of Labor Statistics

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"bona fide factor" §3_bona_fide

A factor other than sex, such as education, training, or experience, that is not based upon or derived from a sex-based differential in compensation, is job-related, consistent with business necessity, and accounts for the entire differential in compensation.

"wage history" §10_wage_history

The wages paid to the prospective employee by the prospective employee's current employer or previous employer.

"establishment" §3_establishment

Employees work for the same employer at workplaces located in the same county or similar political subdivision of a State.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology