S1096-119

Reported

Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 24, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Treats certain drug and biologic patent settlements as presumptively anticompetitive when a generic or biosimilar applicant receives value and delays research, development, manufacturing, marketing, or sales, and gives the Federal Trade Commission civil-penalty and litigation tools to police those agreements.

Who Benefits and How

Patients, health plans, and federal drug purchasers benefit if pay-for-delay settlements are deterred and lower-cost generic or biosimilar competition reaches the market earlier. Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants benefit when the bill protects earlier market entry, preserves antitrust counterclaims, and narrows settlement structures that trade value for delayed competition. FTC competition staff benefit from explicit section 27 authority, a 6-year enforcement window, civil penalties up to three times the attributable value, and direct litigation authority. DOJ antitrust staff benefit from CEO certifications that must describe complete written and oral settlement terms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Brand drug manufacturers and biologic license holders bear new settlement limits because value-for-delay patent settlements are presumed anticompetitive unless they satisfy the statutory defenses. Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants also bear compliance duties because settlement certifications must be complete and violations can trigger penalties or 180-day exclusivity forfeiture. Company executives responsible for negotiations must certify filings within 30 days and expose incomplete side agreements. FTC staff must administer reports, enforcement actions, penalty calculations, and recommendations on whether releases of damages claims should get an additional exclusion.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes a new Federal Trade Commission Act section 27 on compensation for delayed generic or biosimilar entry.
  • Requires a presumption of anticompetitive effect when an ANDA filer or biosimilar applicant receives anything of value and agrees to delay research, development, manufacturing, marketing, or sales.
  • Provides defenses for compensation solely for other goods or services or for settlements whose procompetitive benefits outweigh anticompetitive effects.
  • Authorizes FTC civil actions, mandatory injunctions, equitable relief, and civil penalties up to three times the attributable value.
  • Requires certifications that filed settlement materials include final agreements, ancillary agreements, and written descriptions of responsive oral commitments.
  • Includes Patent Trial and Appeal Board dispute settlements in notification duties and adds section 27 violations as a forfeiture trigger for 180-day generic exclusivity.
  • Requires FTC to report within one year on whether damages-release consideration should receive an additional exclusion and sets a 6-year limitations period after certification.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Treats certain drug and biologic patent settlements as presumptively anticompetitive when a generic or biosimilar applicant receives value and delays research, development, manufacturing, marketing, or sales, and gives the Federal Trade Commission civil-penalty and litigation tools to police those agreements.

Key Policy Areas

Drug Pricing, Antitrust, Patents, Health Care

Primary Purpose

Treats certain drug and biologic patent settlements as presumptively anticompetitive when a generic or biosimilar applicant receives value and delays research, development, manufacturing, marketing, or sales, and gives the Federal Trade Commission civil-penalty and litigation tools to police those agreements.

Policy Domains

Drug Pricing Antitrust Patents Health Care

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Patients, health plans, and federal drug purchasers benefit if pay-for-delay settlements are deterred and lower-cost generic or biosimilar competition reaches the market earlier
  • Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants benefit when the bill protects earlier market entry, preserves antitrust counterclaims, and narrows settlement structures that trade value for delayed competition
  • FTC competition staff benefit from explicit section 27 authority, a 6-year enforcement window, civil penalties up to three times the attributable value, and direct litigation authority
  • DOJ antitrust staff benefit from CEO certifications that must describe complete written and oral settlement terms
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
DOJ antitrust staff benefit from CEO certifications that must describe complete written and oral settlement terms: , , , , , , ,
Patients, health plans, and federal drug purchasers benefit if pay-for-delay settlements are deterred and lower-cost generic or biosimilar competition reaches the market earlier: , , , , , , ,
FTC competition staff benefit from explicit section 27 authority, a 6-year enforcement window, civil penalties up to three times the attributable value, and direct litigation authority: , , , , , , ,
Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants benefit when the bill protects earlier market entry, preserves antitrust counterclaims, and narrows settlement structures that trade value for delayed competition: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Brand drug manufacturers and biologic license holders bear new settlement limits because value-for-delay patent settlements are presumed anticompetitive unless they satisfy the statutory defenses
  • Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants also bear compliance duties because settlement certifications must be complete and violations can trigger penalties or 180-day exclusivity forfeiture
  • Company executives responsible for negotiations must certify filings within 30 days and expose incomplete side agreements
  • FTC staff must administer reports, enforcement actions, penalty calculations, and recommendations on whether releases of damages claims should get an additional exclusion
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Company executives responsible for negotiations must certify filings within 30 days and expose incomplete side agreements: , , , , , , ,
FTC staff must administer reports, enforcement actions, penalty calculations, and recommendations on whether releases of damages claims should get an additional exclusion: , , , , , , ,
Brand drug manufacturers and biologic license holders bear new settlement limits because value-for-delay patent settlements are presumed anticompetitive unless they satisfy the statutory defenses: , , , , , , ,
Generic drug applicants and biosimilar applicants also bear compliance duties because settlement certifications must be complete and violations can trigger penalties or 180-day exclusivity forfeiture: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 10, 2025

Reported by Mr. Grassley, with an amendment

Apr 10, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Apr 10, 2025

Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an …

Apr 3, 2025

Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an …

Mar 24, 2025

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Cramer, …

Mar 24, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 24, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Pharmaceuticals
32 mentions across 12 clauses
+13 positive -19 negative

Biologic license holders, Biologic patent settlement parties, Biologic settlement defendants

Positive-direction: Biosimilar applicants, Biosimilar medicine patients, Generic drug applicants, Generic medicine patients, Later generic applicants

Negative-direction: Biologic license holders, Biologic patent settlement parties, Biologic settlement defendants, Biologic settlement executives, Brand drug manufacturers, Drug patent settlement parties, Drug settlement defendants, Drug settlement executives, First generic applicants

Antitrust
16 mentions across 12 clauses
+9 positive -7 negative

DOJ antitrust staff, FTC competition staff, FTC enforcement staff

FTC competition staff faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: DOJ antitrust staff, FTC litigation staff

Negative-direction: FTC enforcement staff

Health Care
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Prescription drug patients

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Congressional Judiciary Committees

11/22
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Drug Pricing Antitrust Patents Health Care
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"assistant_attorney_general"
→ Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"agreement resolving or settling a patent infringement claim" §27

Includes related agreements entered within 30 days of a patent settlement or contingent on that settlement.

"permitted consideration" §27(b)

Allows earlier marketing rights, litigation-expense payments within the statutory cap, and covenants not to sue.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology