S1084-118

Introduced

To eliminate racial, religious, and other discriminatory profiling by law enforcement, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 30, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill prohibits racial profiling by federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies and creates enforceable standards through data collection requirements and grant conditions. It requires law enforcement agencies receiving federal funds to certify anti-profiling policies and participate in complaint or audit programs.

Who Benefits and How

Racial and ethnic minorities benefit from legal protections against discriminatory stops and searches, with the right to bring civil actions for injunctive relief and attorney's fees. Community and civil rights organizations gain input into regulations and access to published data on law enforcement practices. Small and rural law enforcement agencies are guaranteed equitable access to best practices grants.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Law enforcement agencies face significant new compliance burdens including mandatory data collection on all investigatory stops (disaggregated by race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, and religion), training requirements, and participation in complaint or audit programs. Agencies that fail to comply risk losing federal grant funding under the Byrne JAG and COPS programs.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits racial profiling with private right of action for enforcement
  • Conditions Byrne JAG and COPS grants on anti-profiling certification
  • Requires data collection on hit rates for stops/searches by demographic characteristics
  • Establishes demonstration projects and best practices grants

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits racial, religious, and other discriminatory profiling by law enforcement at federal, state, local, and tribal levels, establishes data collection requirements, and conditions federal law enforcement grants on anti-profiling policies.

Key Policy Areas

Criminal Justice, Civil Rights, Law Enforcement, Federal Grants

Primary Purpose

Prohibits racial, religious, and other discriminatory profiling by law enforcement at federal, state, local, and tribal levels, establishes data collection requirements, and conditions federal law enforcement grants on anti-profiling policies.

Policy Domains

Criminal Justice Civil Rights Law Enforcement Federal Grants

Title I - Prohibition of Racial Profiling

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Racial and ethnic minorities
  • Civil rights plaintiffs and attorneys
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Individual law enforcement officers
  • Supervisory personnel
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Title IV - Data Collection

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Researchers and academics
  • Civil rights advocacy organizations
  • General public
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Law enforcement agencies (data collection burden)
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Title III - Programs to Eliminate Racial Profiling by State and Local Law Enforcement

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Communities subject to discriminatory policing
  • Civil rights organizations
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • State and local law enforcement agencies
  • Units of local government receiving Byrne JAG/COPS funds
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 30, 2023

Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Van …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
11 mentions across 9 clauses
+5 positive -5 negative ?1 uncertain

Grant recipients not complying with anti-profiling requirements, Individual law enforcement officers, Law enforcement agencies

Positive-direction: Law enforcement agencies in minority communities, Law enforcement officers (identity protection), Small and rural law enforcement agencies, State and local anti-profiling programs, State and local law enforcement agencies

Negative-direction: Grant recipients not complying with anti-profiling requirements, Individual law enforcement officers, Law enforcement agencies, State and local law enforcement agencies seeking federal grants

Government
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

Attorney General / Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Congress

Positive-direction: Congress

Negative-direction: Attorney General / Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice Civil Rights Division

General Public
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Communities subject to discriminatory policing, Complainants and witnesses (identity protection), Individuals subject to racial profiling

Nonprofits
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

Civil rights advocacy community, Researchers and civil rights advocates, Transparency advocates seeking officer identification

Positive-direction: Civil rights advocacy community, Researchers and civil rights advocates

Negative-direction: Transparency advocates seeking officer identification

Education
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Institutions of higher education (analysis contracts), Researchers and academics studying policing

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Civil rights attorneys, Law enforcement training providers

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Municipal and state governments (liability exposure), Units of local government receiving Byrne JAG/COPS funds

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Technology vendors providing data collection systems

11/16
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Rights Criminal Justice
Domains
Law Enforcement Federal Government
Actor Mappings
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General of the United States
Domains
Law Enforcement Federal Grants
Actor Mappings
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General of the United States
Domains
Data Collection Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General of the United States
Domains
Congressional Oversight
Actor Mappings
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General of the United States

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"covered program" §2a

Any program funded with Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program or COPS on the Beat program funds

"hit rate" §2b

The percentage of stops and searches in which a law enforcement officer finds drugs, a gun, or something else that leads to an arrest, calculated by dividing total searches by searches yielding contraband

"racial profiling" §2c

The practice of a law enforcement agent or agency relying, to any degree, on actual or perceived race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, or sexual orientation in selecting individuals to subject to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology