S1053-119

In Committee

FIGHT China Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 13, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill defines the Secretary as Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the Act unless otherwise provided, authorizes $150 million appropriation to Treasury (transferable to Commerce) for each of first two fiscal years, and authorizes hiring of 15+ positions without competitive examination requirements, and authorizes President to impose IEEPA sanctions (asset blocking) on covered foreign persons in Chinese defense and surveillance sectors, with penalties for violations and annual reporting to Congress on Non-SDN Chinese. It relies on reporting requirements, compliance mandates, definition changes, and trade restrictions. The main policy areas are National Security, Finance, Trade, and Technology.

Who Benefits and How

Department of the Treasury could gain revenue opportunities, U.S. compliance law firms could gain revenue opportunities, and Department of Commerce could gain revenue opportunities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Treasury OFAC would take on compliance duties, U.S. venture capital firms investing in China would take on compliance duties, and U.S. private equity firms with China investments would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Defines the Secretary as Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the Act unless otherwise provided.
  • Authorizes $150 million appropriation to Treasury (transferable to Commerce) for each of first two fiscal years, and authorizes hiring of 15+ positions without competitive examination requirements.
  • Authorizes President to impose IEEPA sanctions (asset blocking) on covered foreign persons in Chinese defense and surveillance sectors, with penalties for violations and annual reporting to Congress on Non-SDN Chinese...
  • Defines key terms for Title I sanctions including covered foreign person (Chinese entities in defense/surveillance), country of concern (PRC including Hong Kong/Macau), and United States person.
  • Amends Defense Production Act to authorize Treasury to prohibit U.S. persons from investing in prohibited technologies, with waivers for national interest, civil penalties up to $250,000 or 2x transaction value...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill defines the Secretary as Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the Act unless otherwise provided, authorizes $150 million appropriation to Treasury (transferable to Commerce) for each of first two fiscal years, and authorizes hiring of 15+ positions without competitive examination requirements, and authorizes President to impose IEEPA sanctions (asset blocking) on covered foreign persons in Chinese defense and surveillance sectors, with penalties for violations and annual reporting to Congress on Non-SDN Chinese.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Finance, Trade, Technology

Primary Purpose

The bill defines the Secretary as Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the Act unless otherwise provided, authorizes $150 million appropriation to Treasury (transferable to Commerce) for each of first two fiscal years, and authorizes hiring of 15+ positions without competitive examination requirements, and authorizes President to impose IEEPA sanctions (asset blocking) on covered foreign persons in Chinese defense and surveillance sectors, with penalties for violations and annual reporting to Congress on Non-SDN Chinese.

Policy Domains

National Security Finance Trade Technology

Title I - Sanctions

Identified Gains
  • Department of the Treasury
  • U.S. compliance law firms
  • Department of Commerce
  • Federal employees hired under expedited authority
  • U.S. investors seeking compliance guidance
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Department of Commerce:
U.S. compliance law firms:
Department of the Treasury:
U.S. investors seeking compliance guidance:
Federal employees hired under expedited authority:
Identified Costs
  • Treasury OFAC
  • U.S. venture capital firms investing in China
  • U.S. private equity firms with China investments
  • Chinese technology companies in prohibited sectors
  • Chinese defense and surveillance companies
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Treasury OFAC: ,
Chinese defense and surveillance companies:
U.S. venture capital firms investing in China:
U.S. private equity firms with China investments:
Chinese technology companies in prohibited sectors:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 13, 2025

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Scott of …

Mar 13, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, …

Mar 13, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive -5 negative

Allied governments developing similar mechanisms, Commerce Department, Department of Commerce

Positive-direction: Allied governments developing similar mechanisms, Department of Commerce, Department of the Treasury, Federal employees hired under expedited authority

Negative-direction: Commerce Department, State Department, Treasury Department, Treasury OFAC

Manufacturing
6 mentions across 5 clauses
-6 negative

Advanced semiconductor companies in China, Chinese companies potentially listed, Chinese companies potentially subject to listing

Other Financial Investment Activities
4 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -3 negative

U.S. investors seeking compliance guidance, U.S. persons making notifiable investments, U.S. private equity firms with China investments

Positive-direction: U.S. investors seeking compliance guidance

Negative-direction: U.S. persons making notifiable investments, U.S. private equity firms with China investments, U.S. venture capital firms investing in China

Financial Services
3 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative

Financial institutions with compliance obligations, U.S. institutional investors, U.S. investors holding interests in sanctioned entities

Custom Computer Programming Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Chinese AI companies

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

U.S. compliance law firms

Portfolio Management
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Investment managers with China exposure

13/16
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Finance Trade Technology
Actor Mappings
"the_president"
→ President of the United States
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
Domains
Foreign Investment Technology National Security
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"covered foreign person" §102(c)

A foreign person incorporated in, with principal place of business in, or organized under laws of China (including Hong Kong/Macau), owned 50%+ by Chinese entities, or subject to Chinese government direction/control, that knowingly engages in defense or surveillance technology sectors

"country of concern" §102(d)

The People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Macau Special Administrative Region

"notifiable technology" §201-notifiable

Less advanced semiconductors, AI systems for military/surveillance use, and other technologies not meeting prohibited thresholds but still posing national security concerns

"prohibited technology" §201-prohibited

Advanced semiconductors (sub-16nm logic, 128+ layer NAND, sub-18nm DRAM), AI models trained with 10^25+ FLOPs, quantum computers, hypersonic systems, and EUV lithography equipment

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology