Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4776) to amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review process; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1366) to provide for the location of multiple hardrock mining mill sites, to establish the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 845) to require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3616) to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to review regulations that may affect the reliable operation of the bulk-power system; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3632) to amend the Federal Power Act to adjust the requirements for orders, rules, and regulations relating to furnishing adequate service, to require owners or operators of generating facilities to provide notice of planned retirements of certain electric generating units, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4371) to amend the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 to enhance efforts to combat the trafficking of children.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This special rule packages environmental review, mining, endangered-species, electric reliability, power-plant retirement, and child-trafficking measures. This is a special House rule, not final enactment of the underlying policies. Its effect is to decide how the House may consider the named measures: it waives points of order, treats measures as read, sets debate time, identifies adopted committee or Rules Committee text, and preserves only the motions listed in the rule. The measures covered are H.R. 4776 on NEPA review efficiency, H.R. 1366 on hardrock mining mill sites and the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund, H.R. 845 on gray wolf delisting regulations, H.R. 3616 on FERC review of regulations affecting bulk-power reliability, H.R. 3632 on adequate-service rules and notice of planned generating-unit retirements, and H.R. 4371 enhancing efforts to combat trafficking of children. That procedural design matters because it can move controversial disapproval resolutions or policy bills to a final vote while limiting the ability to raise procedural objections or offer amendments.
Who Benefits and How
Project developers seeking faster NEPA reviews, hardrock mining operators, gray-wolf delisting supporters, electric-grid reliability advocates, generating facility operators seeking clearer retirement notice rules, and child-trafficking enforcement supporters benefit procedurally. House majority leadership benefits because the rule converts the covered measures into a controlled floor package. The House Rules Committee benefits because its report and special-rule language define the operative text and amendment process. Committee chairs benefit when they control debate time for their committee's measures. Supporters of the underlying resolutions or bills benefit because the waiver and previous-question language reduce procedural friction.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Environmental-review advocates, abandoned-mine cleanup stakeholders facing funding design choices, gray-wolf protection supporters, regulators affected by FERC review, Members seeking unprinted amendments, and opponents of the covered bills bear burdens. House Members seeking amendments bear a burden because amendments are barred or limited to the Rules Committee report. House minority leadership bears a burden because debate time is capped and the previous question prevents intervening motions except those named in the rule. Opponents of the covered measures lose some procedural tools because points of order against consideration and against provisions are waived. The House Clerk and floor staff must implement the timing, reading, amendment, and message instructions.
Key Provisions
- Provides consideration of H.R. 4776 on NEPA review timing and ambiguity.
- Provides consideration of H.R. 1366 on hardrock mining mill sites and an abandoned mine fund.
- Provides consideration of H.R. 845 on gray-wolf delisting regulations.
- Provides consideration of H.R. 3616 and H.R. 3632 on electricity reliability and generator retirement notice.
- Provides consideration of H.R. 4371 on child-trafficking enforcement.
- Waives points of order and limits debate and amendment options under the special rule.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 4776 NEPA review changes, H.R. 1366 hardrock mining mill sites and Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund, H.R. 845 gray-wolf delisting regulations, H.R. 3616 FERC reliability review, H.R. 3632 generating-unit retirement notice requirements, and H.R. 4371 child-trafficking enforcement changes.
Key Policy Areas
Government, Environment, Energy, Mining, Human Trafficking
Primary Purpose
Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 4776 NEPA review changes, H.R. 1366 hardrock mining mill sites and Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund, H.R. 845 gray-wolf delisting regulations, H.R. 3616 FERC reliability review, H.R. 3632 generating-unit retirement notice requirements, and H.R. 4371 child-trafficking enforcement changes.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- House majority leadership
- Project developers seeking faster NEPA reviews
- Hardrock mining operators
- Electric-grid reliability advocates
- Generating facility operators
- Child-trafficking enforcement supporters
Identified Costs
- House Members seeking floor amendments
- Environmental-review advocates
- Gray-wolf protection supporters
- Federal regulators affected by FERC review
- Opponents of the covered bills
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseMr. Langworthy, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following …
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4776, under a …
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas …
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed …
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5919-5921)
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Child-trafficking enforcement supporters, Electric-grid reliability advocates, Hardrock mining operators
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 4776) the SPEED Act; (H.R. 1366) the Mining Regulato…
On Ordering the Previous Question
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 4776) the SPEED Act; (H.R. 1366) the Mining Regulato…
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ferc"
- → Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- "interior"
- → Secretary of the Interior
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology