HRES78-119

In Committee

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit certain resolutions to be privileged only if they are based on conduct which was the subject of an investigation and report by the appropriate committee of jurisdiction or if they are offered by direction of a party caucus or conference.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 28, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This resolution changes the House Rules to make it harder for individual members to force votes on impeachment, censure, expulsion, or other serious disciplinary resolutions. Under the new rule, such resolutions can only be considered as "privileged" (meaning they can bypass normal committee procedures and come directly to the floor) if either: (1) the relevant committee has already investigated and recommended the action, or (2) the party caucus or conference has officially directed that the resolution be offered.

Who Benefits and How

House committee chairs gain significant gatekeeping power, as they control whether investigations proceed and whether reports recommending action are filed. Party leadership (Democratic Caucus and Republican Conference) also benefits by gaining veto power over these high-stakes resolutions - individual members can no longer force floor votes without party approval. Executive branch officials who might be targets of impeachment face reduced risk of impromptu impeachment efforts driven by individual members.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Individual House members, particularly those in the minority party, lose their ability to force votes on impeachment, censure, or expulsion resolutions without committee or party support. This restricts a longstanding procedural tool that minority members have used to draw attention to alleged misconduct or force public accountability votes. Advocacy groups and constituents who rely on individual members to raise accountability issues also face higher barriers to forcing congressional action.

Key Provisions

  • Requires committee investigation and formal report before impeachment resolutions can be considered as privileged matters
  • Allows party caucus or conference to override the committee requirement by formally directing that a resolution be offered
  • Applies to resolutions impeaching government officers, censuring or expelling members, or creating vacancies in Speaker or committee leadership positions
  • Amends House Rule IX by adding these requirements to the existing rules governing privileged resolutions

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends House Rules to require committee investigation or party caucus approval before certain privileged resolutions (impeachment, censure, expulsion) can be considered.

Who Benefits

  • House Leadership
  • Committee Chairs
  • Party Leadership

Who Bears Costs

  • Individual Members seeking to force impeachment/censure votes
  • Minority party members

Key Policy Areas

Congressional Procedure, Legislative Rules

Primary Purpose

Amends House Rules to require committee investigation or party caucus approval before certain privileged resolutions (impeachment, censure, expulsion) can be considered.

Policy Domains

Congressional Procedure Legislative Rules

Legislative Strategy

"Restrict ability of individual members to force votes on impeachment, censure, or expulsion without committee process or party support"

Identified Gains

  • House Leadership
  • Committee Chairs
  • Party Leadership

Identified Costs

  • Individual Members seeking to force impeachment/censure votes
  • Minority party members

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 28, 2025

Ms. Williams of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Congressional Members
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Individual House Members (particularly minority party)

Congressional Committees
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

House Committee Chairs with jurisdiction

Congressional Leadership
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Party Leadership (Caucus/Conference leaders)

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Officers of Government (potential impeachment targets)

1/1
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Congressional Procedure
Actor Mappings
"the_committee"
→ Committee with jurisdiction over the resolution
"party_caucus_or_conference"
→ Democratic Caucus or Republican Conference

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"resolution described in this paragraph" §3(b)

A resolution impeaching an officer of the Government, or a resolution to censure, reprimand, or expel a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner or to cause a vacancy to occur in the office of the Speaker or in the position of a chair or ranking minority member of a committee

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology