Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 471) to expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This special rule packages a forest management and wildfire-resilience bill with an immigration detention bill. This is a special House rule, not final enactment of the underlying policies. Its effect is to decide how the House may consider the named measures: it waives points of order, treats measures as read, sets debate time, identifies adopted committee or Rules Committee text, and preserves only the motions listed in the rule. The measures covered are H.R. 471 on National Forest System lands, Bureau of Land Management lands, and Tribal lands to improve forest management and return resilience to overgrown fire-prone forested lands, and S. 5 requiring the Secretary of Homeland Security to take custody of noncitizens charged with theft and for related purposes. That procedural design matters because it can move controversial disapproval resolutions or policy bills to a final vote while limiting the ability to raise procedural objections or offer amendments.
Who Benefits and How
Forest managers seeking expedited NEPA review, communities near fire-prone federal or Tribal forests, timber and land-management contractors, immigration enforcement officials, and supporters of mandatory DHS custody for theft-related charges benefit procedurally. House majority leadership benefits because the rule converts the covered measures into a controlled floor package. The House Rules Committee benefits because its report and special-rule language define the operative text and amendment process. Committee chairs benefit when they control debate time for their committee's measures. Supporters of the underlying resolutions or bills benefit because the waiver and previous-question language reduce procedural friction.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Environmental-review advocates, Tribal governments affected by federal forest-management decisions, noncitizens charged with covered offenses, Members seeking open amendments, and opponents of S. 5 bear burdens. House Members seeking amendments bear a burden because amendments are barred or limited to the Rules Committee report. House minority leadership bears a burden because debate time is capped and the previous question prevents intervening motions except those named in the rule. Opponents of the covered measures lose some procedural tools because points of order against consideration and against provisions are waived. The House Clerk and floor staff must implement the timing, reading, amendment, and message instructions.
Key Provisions
- Provides consideration of H.R. 471 on expedited forest management and NEPA procedures.
- Provides consideration of S. 5 requiring DHS custody of certain noncitizens charged with theft.
- Waives points of order against consideration and provisions in both measures.
- Limits debate and amendment options under the special rule.
- Preserves the specified motion to recommit structure.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 471 expediting NEPA review and forest management on National Forest System, BLM, and Tribal lands and S. 5 requiring DHS custody of certain noncitizens charged with theft and related offenses.
Key Policy Areas
Government, Forestry, Immigration
Primary Purpose
Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 471 expediting NEPA review and forest management on National Forest System, BLM, and Tribal lands and S. 5 requiring DHS custody of certain noncitizens charged with theft and related offenses.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- House majority leadership
- Forest managers
- Communities near fire-prone forests
- Land-management contractors
- Immigration enforcement officials
- Supporters of S. 5
Identified Costs
- House Members seeking floor amendments
- Environmental-review advocates
- Tribal governments affected by forest decisions
- Noncitizens charged with covered offenses
- Opponents of S. 5
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HousePassed House (inferred from eh version)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H268-276)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: …
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed …
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Communities near fire-prone forests, Forest managers, House Clerk
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "blm"
- → Bureau of Land Management
- "dhs"
- → Department of Homeland Security
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology