HRES415-119

In Committee

Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors.

119th Congress Introduced May 15, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does
This is a House Resolution introducing one Article of Impeachment against President Donald John Trump. It charges him with undermining democracy by disregarding federal court orders, attacking the independence of the judiciary, and failing to uphold his constitutional oath. The specific incident involves the illegal deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador despite court orders prohibiting his removal.

Who Benefits and How
The federal judiciary benefits from the defense of judicial independence and the principle that court orders must be obeyed. Non-citizens with legal protections (such as withholding orders) would benefit if the resolution reinforces that due process protections cannot be ignored. Democratic institutions broadly benefit from the assertion that no official is above the law.

Who Bears the Burden and How
President Donald John Trump faces formal charges of high crimes and misdemeanors that could lead to removal from office if the Senate convicts. Other named Trump Administration officials, including Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, are implicated for their roles in the alleged violations. The U.S. Senate would bear the burden of conducting an impeachment trial.

Key Provisions
- Charges President Trump with devolving democracy into authoritarianism by disregarding judicial orders and the separation of powers
- Cites the illegal deportation of Abrego Garcia to El Salvador despite a 2019 withholding order protecting him
- References multiple federal court findings, including a probable cause finding for criminal contempt against administration defendants
- Documents Trump calling for a federal judge to be impeached and responding "I don't know" when asked if he must uphold the Constitution
- Concludes that Trump warrants impeachment, trial, and removal from office as unfit to serve as President

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Articles of Impeachment charging President Donald John Trump with high crimes and misdemeanors for undermining judicial independence, disregarding court orders, and devolving democracy into authoritarianism.

Who Benefits

  • Federal judiciary (through defense of judicial independence)
  • Non-citizens with due process protections
  • Constitutional order and rule of law

Who Bears Costs

  • President Donald John Trump
  • Trump Administration officials (Attorney General, Secretary of State, Deputy Chief of Staff)
  • Executive branch authority to conduct deportations without judicial oversight

Key Policy Areas

Constitutional Law, Separation of Powers, Judicial Independence, Immigration Enforcement, Executive Power

Primary Purpose

Articles of Impeachment charging President Donald John Trump with high crimes and misdemeanors for undermining judicial independence, disregarding court orders, and devolving democracy into authoritarianism.

Policy Domains

Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Judicial Independence Immigration Enforcement Executive Power

Legislative Strategy

"Constitutional accountability through the impeachment process for alleged executive overreach and disregard of judicial orders"

Identified Gains

  • Federal judiciary (through defense of judicial independence)
  • Non-citizens with due process protections
  • Constitutional order and rule of law
  • Democratic institutions

Identified Costs

  • President Donald John Trump
  • Trump Administration officials (Attorney General, Secretary of State, Deputy Chief of Staff)
  • Executive branch authority to conduct deportations without judicial oversight

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 15, 2025

Mr. Green of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
17 mentions across 17 clauses
-17 negative

Executive Branch officials, President Donald John Trump, Trump Administration

Judicial Branch
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Federal judges, Federal judiciary

Positive-direction: Federal judiciary

Negative-direction: Federal judges

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

All persons in U.S.

21/49
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Immigration Enforcement
Actor Mappings
"the_court"
→ U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia / U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
"the_president"
→ President Donald John Trump
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General Pamela Bondi
"the_supreme_court"
→ Supreme Court of the United States
"secretary_of_state"
→ Secretary of State Marco Rubio
"chief_judge_boasberg"
→ Chief Judge James E. Boasberg
"deputy_chief_of_staff"
→ White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"authoritarianism" §section_4

Relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people (per Merriam-Webster)

"withholding order" §withholding_order

An Immigration Judge order prohibiting removal of an individual to a specific country due to clear probability of persecution

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology