HRES294-119

Passed House

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This special rule combines two CFPB Congressional Review Act disapproval resolutions, two policy bills, and separate House-procedure actions. This is a special House rule, not final enactment of the underlying policies. Its effect is to decide how the House may consider the named measures: it waives points of order, treats measures as read, sets debate time, identifies adopted committee or Rules Committee text, and preserves only the motions listed in the rule. The measures covered are S.J. Res. 18 on the CFPB overdraft-lending rule for very large financial institutions, S.J. Res. 28 on CFPB supervision of larger participants in general-use digital consumer payment applications, H.R. 1526 limiting district-court injunctive relief, H.R. 22 requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections, H. Res. 293 on announcing pairs, and H. Res. 164, which is laid on the table. That procedural design matters because it can move controversial disapproval resolutions or policy bills to a final vote while limiting the ability to raise procedural objections or offer amendments.

Who Benefits and How

Very large financial institutions opposing the overdraft rule, digital payment application providers subject to CFPB larger-participant supervision, supporters of limiting nationwide injunctions, supporters of proof-of-citizenship voter registration, and Members who use pair announcements benefit procedurally. House majority leadership benefits because the rule converts the covered measures into a controlled floor package. The House Rules Committee benefits because its report and special-rule language define the operative text and amendment process. Committee chairs benefit when they control debate time for their committee's measures. Supporters of the underlying resolutions or bills benefit because the waiver and previous-question language reduce procedural friction.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Consumers protected by CFPB overdraft and digital-payment rules, litigants seeking broad district-court injunctions, voter-registration applicants without ready citizenship documentation, Members seeking open amendments, and supporters of H. Res. 164 bear procedural or policy burdens. House Members seeking amendments bear a burden because amendments are barred or limited to the Rules Committee report. House minority leadership bears a burden because debate time is capped and the previous question prevents intervening motions except those named in the rule. Opponents of the covered measures lose some procedural tools because points of order against consideration and against provisions are waived. The House Clerk and floor staff must implement the timing, reading, amendment, and message instructions.

Key Provisions

  • Provides consideration of S.J. Res. 18 with Financial Services Committee debate and a motion to commit.
  • Provides consideration of S.J. Res. 28 with Financial Services Committee debate and a motion to commit.
  • Provides consideration of H.R. 1526 with the Judiciary Committee substitute treated as adopted.
  • Provides consideration of H.R. 22 with House Administration Committee debate and one motion to recommit.
  • Adopts H. Res. 293 on written-list pair announcements.
  • Tables H. Res. 164.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Sets House floor procedures for S.J. Res. 18 disapproving the CFPB overdraft-lending rule, S.J. Res. 28 disapproving the CFPB digital-payment larger-participant rule, H.R. 1526 limiting district-court injunctive relief, H.R. 22 requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration, adopts H. Res. 293, and tables H. Res. 164.

Key Policy Areas

Government, Financial Services, Courts, Elections

Primary Purpose

Sets House floor procedures for S.J. Res. 18 disapproving the CFPB overdraft-lending rule, S.J. Res. 28 disapproving the CFPB digital-payment larger-participant rule, H.R. 1526 limiting district-court injunctive relief, H.R. 22 requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration, adopts H. Res. 293, and tables H. Res. 164.

Policy Domains

Government Financial Services Courts Elections

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • House majority leadership
  • Very large financial institutions
  • Digital payment application providers
  • Supporters of H.R. 1526
  • Supporters of H.R. 22
  • Members using pair announcements
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Supporters of H.R. 22:
Supporters of H.R. 1526:
House majority leadership:
Members using pair announcements:
Very large financial institutions:
Digital payment application providers:
Identified Costs
  • House Members seeking floor amendments
  • Consumers protected by CFPB overdraft rules
  • Consumers using digital payment applications
  • Litigants seeking broad injunctions
  • Voter-registration applicants without ready citizenship documents
  • Supporters of H. Res. 164
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Supporters of H. Res. 164:
Litigants seeking broad injunctions:
House Members seeking floor amendments:
Consumers protected by CFPB overdraft rules:
Consumers using digital payment applications:
Voter-registration applicants without ready citizenship documents:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 8, 2025

Apr 8, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Apr 7, 2025

Ms. Foxx, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
10 mentions across 1 clause
-3 negative ?7 uncertain

House Clerk, House Members seeking floor amendments, House Rules Committee

1/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Financial Services Courts Elections
Actor Mappings
"cfpb"
→ Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
"rules_committee"
→ House Committee on Rules

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology