HRES177-119

Passed House

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 61) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing"; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 11) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".

119th Congress Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This special rule packages three Congressional Review Act disapproval resolutions for floor consideration. This is a special House rule, not final enactment of the underlying policies. Its effect is to decide how the House may consider the named measures: it waives points of order, treats measures as read, sets debate time, identifies adopted committee or Rules Committee text, and preserves only the motions listed in the rule. The measures covered are H.J. Res. 42 on Department of Energy certification, labeling, and enforcement provisions for certain consumer products and commercial equipment; H.J. Res. 61 on Environmental Protection Agency hazardous-air-pollutant standards for rubber tire manufacturing; and S.J. Res. 11 on Bureau of Ocean Energy Management protections for marine archaeological resources. That procedural design matters because it can move controversial disapproval resolutions or policy bills to a final vote while limiting the ability to raise procedural objections or offer amendments.

Who Benefits and How

Manufacturers and commercial-equipment sellers opposing DOE appliance compliance rules, rubber tire manufacturers opposing EPA hazardous-air-pollutant standards, offshore-energy developers affected by BOEM archaeological-resource protections, and House majority leadership benefit from protected floor votes. House majority leadership benefits because the rule converts the covered measures into a controlled floor package. The House Rules Committee benefits because its report and special-rule language define the operative text and amendment process. Committee chairs benefit when they control debate time for their committee's measures. Supporters of the underlying resolutions or bills benefit because the waiver and previous-question language reduce procedural friction.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Supporters of DOE appliance certification and labeling enforcement, communities protected by hazardous-air-pollutant rules, marine archaeological resource advocates, Members seeking open amendments, and opponents of the disapproval resolutions bear the burden. House Members seeking amendments bear a burden because amendments are barred or limited to the Rules Committee report. House minority leadership bears a burden because debate time is capped and the previous question prevents intervening motions except those named in the rule. Opponents of the covered measures lose some procedural tools because points of order against consideration and against provisions are waived. The House Clerk and floor staff must implement the timing, reading, amendment, and message instructions.

Key Provisions

  • Provides consideration of H.J. Res. 42 with Energy and Commerce Committee debate.
  • Provides consideration of H.J. Res. 61 with Energy and Commerce Committee debate.
  • Provides consideration of S.J. Res. 11 with Natural Resources Committee debate and one motion to commit.
  • Waives points of order against consideration and provisions for each disapproval resolution.
  • Limits each covered resolution to the debate and final-vote structure specified in the rule.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Sets House floor procedures for H.J. Res. 42 disapproving DOE appliance-standard certification, labeling, and enforcement provisions; H.J. Res. 61 disapproving EPA hazardous-air-pollutant standards for rubber tire manufacturing; and S.J. Res. 11 disapproving BOEM marine archaeological resources protections.

Key Policy Areas

Government, Energy, Environment, Manufacturing

Primary Purpose

Sets House floor procedures for H.J. Res. 42 disapproving DOE appliance-standard certification, labeling, and enforcement provisions; H.J. Res. 61 disapproving EPA hazardous-air-pollutant standards for rubber tire manufacturing; and S.J. Res. 11 disapproving BOEM marine archaeological resources protections.

Policy Domains

Government Energy Environment Manufacturing

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • House majority leadership
  • Supporters of H.J. Res. 42
  • Commercial equipment manufacturers
  • Rubber tire manufacturers
  • Offshore-energy developers
  • Supporters of S.J. Res. 11
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
House majority leadership:
Rubber tire manufacturers:
Offshore-energy developers:
Supporters of H.J. Res. 42:
Supporters of S.J. Res. 11:
Commercial equipment manufacturers:
Identified Costs
  • House Members seeking floor amendments
  • Supporters of DOE appliance enforcement
  • Communities protected by hazardous-air-pollutant rules
  • Marine archaeological resource advocates
  • Opponents of the disapproval resolutions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
House Members seeking floor amendments:
Supporters of DOE appliance enforcement:
Marine archaeological resource advocates:
Opponents of the disapproval resolutions:
Communities protected by hazardous-air-pollutant rules:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 4, 2025

Mar 4, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Mar 4, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Mar 4, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. …

Mar 4, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …

Mar 4, 2025

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H955-960)

Mar 4, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Mar 4, 2025

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: …

Mar 4, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed …

Mar 4, 2025

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Environment
18 mentions across 2 clauses
-6 negative ?12 uncertain

Commercial equipment manufacturers, House Clerk, House Members seeking floor amendments

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Energy Environment Manufacturing
Actor Mappings
"doe"
→ Department of Energy
"epa"
→ Environmental Protection Agency
"boem"
→ Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology