HRES161-119

Passed House

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 20) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions"; and providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.

119th Congress Introduced Feb 25, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This rule moves two Congressional Review Act disapproval resolutions and the fiscal year 2025 budget resolution to the House floor. This is a special House rule, not final enactment of the underlying policies. Its effect is to decide how the House may consider the named measures: it waives points of order, treats measures as read, sets debate time, identifies adopted committee or Rules Committee text, and preserves only the motions listed in the rule. The measures covered are H.J. Res. 20 on Department of Energy water-heater energy-conservation standards, H.J. Res. 35 on Environmental Protection Agency waste-emissions-charge procedures for petroleum and natural gas systems, and H. Con. Res. 14 on the congressional budget for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. That procedural design matters because it can move controversial disapproval resolutions or policy bills to a final vote while limiting the ability to raise procedural objections or offer amendments.

Who Benefits and How

Supporters of repealing the DOE water-heater rule, petroleum and natural gas operators opposing the EPA waste-emissions-charge rule, House Budget Committee leadership, and supporters of the budget resolution receive a procedural path to votes. House majority leadership benefits because the rule converts the covered measures into a controlled floor package. The House Rules Committee benefits because its report and special-rule language define the operative text and amendment process. Committee chairs benefit when they control debate time for their committee's measures. Supporters of the underlying resolutions or bills benefit because the waiver and previous-question language reduce procedural friction.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Supporters of DOE efficiency standards, supporters of the EPA methane-fee compliance rule, Members seeking budget amendments outside the rule, and opponents of H. Con. Res. 14 face procedural disadvantages. House Members seeking amendments bear a burden because amendments are barred or limited to the Rules Committee report. House minority leadership bears a burden because debate time is capped and the previous question prevents intervening motions except those named in the rule. Opponents of the covered measures lose some procedural tools because points of order against consideration and against provisions are waived. The House Clerk and floor staff must implement the timing, reading, amendment, and message instructions.

Key Provisions

  • Provides consideration of H.J. Res. 20 with one hour of Energy and Commerce debate.
  • Provides consideration of H.J. Res. 35 with one hour of Energy and Commerce debate.
  • Provides Committee of the Whole consideration of H. Con. Res. 14 with three hours of budget and economic-goals debate.
  • Waives points of order against consideration and against provisions in the covered measures.
  • Limits post-debate options by ordering the previous question and barring a division demand on the budget resolution.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Sets House floor procedures for H.J. Res. 20 disapproving DOE gas-fired instantaneous water-heater standards, H.J. Res. 35 disapproving EPA waste-emissions-charge procedures for petroleum and natural gas systems, and H. Con. Res. 14 establishing fiscal year 2025 budget levels through 2034.

Key Policy Areas

Government, Energy, Budget

Primary Purpose

Sets House floor procedures for H.J. Res. 20 disapproving DOE gas-fired instantaneous water-heater standards, H.J. Res. 35 disapproving EPA waste-emissions-charge procedures for petroleum and natural gas systems, and H. Con. Res. 14 establishing fiscal year 2025 budget levels through 2034.

Policy Domains

Government Energy Budget

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • House majority leadership
  • Supporters of H.J. Res. 20
  • Petroleum and natural gas operators
  • House Budget Committee leadership
  • Supporters of H. Con. Res. 14
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
House majority leadership: ,
Supporters of H.J. Res. 20: ,
Supporters of H. Con. Res. 14: ,
House Budget Committee leadership: ,
Petroleum and natural gas operators: ,
Identified Costs
  • House Members seeking floor amendments
  • House minority leadership
  • Supporters of DOE water-heater standards
  • Supporters of EPA waste-emissions-charge procedures
  • Opponents of H. Con. Res. 14
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
House minority leadership: ,
Opponents of H. Con. Res. 14: ,
House Members seeking floor amendments: ,
Supporters of DOE water-heater standards: ,
Supporters of EPA waste-emissions-charge procedures: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 25, 2025

Feb 25, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Feb 25, 2025

Mrs. Houchin, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following …

Feb 25, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Feb 25, 2025

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: …

Feb 25, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed …

Feb 25, 2025

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas …

Feb 25, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H790-791)

Feb 25, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. …

Feb 25, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
24 mentions across 3 clauses
-9 negative ?15 uncertain

House Clerk, House Members seeking floor amendments, House Rules Committee

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Energy Budget
Actor Mappings
"rules_committee"
→ House Committee on Rules
"budget_committee"
→ Committee on the Budget

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology