HRES116-119

In Committee

Condemning the pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police Officers.

119th Congress Introduced Feb 5, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: That the House of Representatives disapproves of any pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police officers. The main policy areas are Immigration and Criminal Justice.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: That the House of Representatives disapproves of any pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police officers.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: That the House of Representatives disapproves of any pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police officers.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Criminal Justice

Primary Purpose

The bill creates introduces a neutral technical change provision: That the House of Representatives disapproves of any pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police officers.

Policy Domains

Immigration Criminal Justice

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 5, 2025

Mrs. Watson Coleman (for herself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Ms. …

Feb 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 5, 2025

Submitted in House

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Criminal Justice
Actor Mappings
"federal_implementing_agencies"
→ Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology