HRES1009-119

Passed House

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 20, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

This House rule resolution makes three measures eligible for floor consideration. It provides H.R. 6945, concerning state authority to use TANF funds for pregnancy centers, with a Rules Committee Print 119-17 substitute, waives points of order, treats the bill as read, provides one hour of Ways and Means debate, and allows one motion to recommit. It provides H.R. 6359, requiring higher education institutions to disseminate information on pregnant students' rights, accommodations, and resources, with the Education and Workforce Committee substitute adopted, waives points of order, provides one hour of debate, and allows one motion to recommit. It also provides H.J. Res. 140, a Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution for a Bureau of Land Management public land withdrawal order in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota, with one hour of Natural Resources debate and one recommit motion.

Who Benefits and How

House majority leadership benefits by scheduling three priority social policy, education, and public-land measures under controlled floor terms. Supporters of pregnancy centers benefit because H.R. 6945 gets a protected path to a vote on TANF-use authority. Pregnant students benefit procedurally because H.R. 6359 receives floor time on information about rights, accommodations, and resources. Supporters of the BLM disapproval resolution benefit because H.J. Res. 140 can move toward overturning Public Land Order No. 7917 for Minnesota lands. State TANF agencies, higher education institutions, and public-land users benefit or bear burdens depending on the underlying bills, but this resolution mainly determines the floor path.

Who Bears the Burden and How

House Members seeking unprinted amendments or procedural objections bear a burden because points of order are waived, substitutes are treated as adopted, and debate is limited. House minority leadership must operate within one hour of debate and one recommit motion for each measure. Opponents of pregnancy-center TANF authority, opponents of the pregnant-student information bill, and defenders of the BLM withdrawal order face a procedural disadvantage because the rule protects the measures from floor challenges. Committee staff must manage separate debate time across Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, and Natural Resources jurisdictions.

Key Provisions

  • Provides consideration of H.R. 6945 with Rules Committee Print 119-17 treated as adopted.
  • Provides consideration of H.R. 6359 with the Education and Workforce substitute treated as adopted.
  • Provides consideration of H.J. Res. 140 disapproving the BLM Public Land Order No. 7917 withdrawal.
  • Waives points of order against consideration and provisions of each covered measure.
  • Establishes one hour of debate and one motion to recommit for each measure.
  • Orders the previous question to final passage for the three covered measures.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 6945 on TANF funds for pregnancy centers, H.R. 6359 on pregnant-student rights and accommodation information at higher education institutions, and H.J. Res. 140 disapproving the Bureau of Land Management withdrawal order for federal lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota.

Key Policy Areas

House Procedure, Social Services, Higher Education, Public Lands

Primary Purpose

Sets House floor procedures for H.R. 6945 on TANF funds for pregnancy centers, H.R. 6359 on pregnant-student rights and accommodation information at higher education institutions, and H.J. Res. 140 disapproving the Bureau of Land Management withdrawal order for federal lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota.

Policy Domains

House Procedure Social Services Higher Education Public Lands

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • House majority leadership
  • Supporters of pregnancy centers
  • Pregnant students
  • Supporters of the BLM disapproval resolution
  • State TANF agencies
  • Higher education institutions
  • Public-land users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Pregnant students:
Public-land users:
State TANF agencies:
House majority leadership:
Higher education institutions:
Supporters of pregnancy centers:
Supporters of the BLM disapproval resolution:
Identified Costs
  • House Members seeking unprinted amendments
  • House minority leadership
  • Opponents of pregnancy-center TANF authority
  • Opponents of the pregnant-student information bill
  • Defenders of the BLM withdrawal order
  • Committee staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Committee staff:
House minority leadership:
Defenders of the BLM withdrawal order:
House Members seeking unprinted amendments:
Opponents of pregnancy-center TANF authority:
Opponents of the pregnant-student information bill:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 21, 2026

Jan 21, 2026 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jan 21, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 21, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 21, 2026

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: …

Jan 21, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed …

Jan 21, 2026

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas …

Jan 21, 2026

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1138-1139)

Jan 21, 2026

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. …

Jan 21, 2026

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
8 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive -4 negative

House Members seeking open amendments, House majority leadership, House minority leadership

Positive-direction: House majority leadership, Supporters of H.R. 6359, Supporters of H.R. 6945

Negative-direction: House Members seeking open amendments, House minority leadership

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
House Procedure Social Services Higher Education Public Lands
Actor Mappings
"blm"
→ Bureau of Land Management
"rules_committee"
→ House Committee on Rules

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology