HR9771-119

Reported

Stopping Foreign Influence in Elections Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jul 18, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates two sanctions for a tax-exempt organization that contributes to a political committee or a tax-exempt section 501(c)(4) organization after receiving any foreign-national contribution or gift during a two-year lookback. The lookback excludes time before enactment. The definition does not require tracing the outgoing dollars to the foreign gift and contains no minimum foreign-gift amount. The rule therefore reaches transfers to social-welfare organizations, not only election committees or spending expressly earmarked for campaigns.

Who Benefits and How

Taxpayers and domestic voter communities seeking to limit foreign financial influence gain a new tax-enforcement deterrent. Internal Revenue Service officials gain penalty and tax-exemption enforcement tools. Organizations may rely on a donor's nationality representation unless they know or should know it is false. That reliance rule can reduce investigation costs, but it does not excuse deliberate disregard of contrary facts.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Annual-return-filing section 501(c) organizations meeting either $200,000 in prior-year receipts or $500,000 in prior-year-end assets face a penalty of twice the disqualified contribution. A separate amendment to section 501 imposes a 100 percent tax for the first such contribution, 200 percent for the second, and 200 percent plus a two-year loss of exemption for later contributions. That separate provision refers to any section 501(c) organization and does not repeat the size thresholds. The text provides no express offset between these sanctions, so treating them as one universal penalty would understate exposure. Nonprofit administrators must track receipts and transfers; recipient political committees and social-welfare organizations could lose funding opportunities. A two-year period without disqualified contributions resets the escalation count. Applicability begins for contributions made more than one year after enactment.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a twice-the-contribution penalty for annual-return filers meeting either size threshold.
  • Adds separate escalating section 501 taxes and a two-year exemption loss after repeated disqualified transfers.
  • Defines political recipients to include both political committees and tax-exempt section 501(c)(4) organizations.
  • Requires a two-year lookback without pre-enactment time and permits qualified reliance on donor representations.
  • Provides an escalation reset after two clean years and delays applicability for one year.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Impose tax penalties on section 501(c) organizations making covered political transfers after receiving foreign-national gifts, with escalating exemption consequences.

Key Policy Areas

Taxation, Elections

Primary Purpose

Impose tax penalties on section 501(c) organizations making covered political transfers after receiving foreign-national gifts, with escalating exemption consequences.

Policy Domains

Taxation Elections

Stopping Foreign Influence in Elections Act of 2026

Identified Gains
  • Taxpayers seeking foreign-funding safeguards
  • Domestic voter communities
  • Internal Revenue Service
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Internal Revenue Service: , , , , , , ,
Domestic voter communities: , , , , , , ,
Taxpayers seeking foreign-funding safeguards: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Section 501(c) nonprofit organization administrators
  • Recipient political committees
  • Recipient social-welfare organizations
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Recipient political committees: , , , , , , ,
Recipient social-welfare organizations: , , , , , , ,
Section 501(c) nonprofit organization administrators: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 27, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 669.

Aug 27, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. …

Aug 27, 2026

Additional sponsor: Mr. Fine

Aug 27, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Jul 22, 2026

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 23 …

Jul 22, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 18, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Jul 18, 2026

Introduced in House

Jul 18, 2026

Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Nonprofits
3 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative

Covered larger section 501(c) organizations, Recipient social-welfare organizations, Section 501(c) organizations making disqualified transfers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Internal Revenue Service

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Domestic voter communities

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Taxation Elections
Actor Mappings
"irs"
→ Internal Revenue Service
"recipient"
→ Political committees and exempt section 501(c)(4) organizations
"specified"
→ Annual-return-filing section 501(c) organizations meeting the section 6720D size tests
"section501"
→ Any section 501(c) organization making a defined disqualified contribution

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"disqualified political committee contribution" §6720D(b)

A contribution to a defined political entity after any foreign-national contribution or gift during the two-year post-enactment-limited testing period.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology