To prevent agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct surveillance of United States citizens, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was …
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Buzz Off Act prohibits federal law enforcement agencies from using drones to spy on U.S. citizens or their property without permission. Agencies like the FBI, DEA, ATF, and Border Patrol would need either written consent from the person being surveilled, a warrant from a judge, or special authorization from the President and Secretary of Homeland Security for high-risk terrorist threats.
Who Benefits and How
American citizens and property owners benefit from enhanced privacy protections. They can no longer be targeted by federal drone surveillance without their knowledge or a court order. Civil liberties and privacy advocacy groups also benefit as this law advances their mission to protect constitutional rights from warrantless surveillance.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal law enforcement agencies face significant new restrictions on their investigative capabilities. The FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE, Border Patrol, and other agencies must now obtain judicial warrants to use drones for investigations, creating additional administrative work and delays. The Department of Homeland Security gains new responsibilities to evaluate and certify under oath any high-risk terrorist threats before authorizing drone surveillance. Federal judges will see increased workload from processing drone surveillance warrant applications. Drone manufacturers serving the law enforcement market will likely see reduced demand as agencies face restrictions on use.
Key Provisions
- Prohibits federal law enforcement from using drones to intentionally conduct surveillance, gather evidence, or record U.S. citizens or their private property
- Allows drone surveillance only with written consent from the person being surveilled
- Creates exception requiring a search warrant signed by a judge for law enforcement drone use
- Establishes national security exception where the President, through the DHS Secretary, can authorize surveillance by certifying under oath that it's necessary to counter a high-risk terrorist attack by a specific individual or organization
- Applies to all federal law enforcement agencies including FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE, Border Patrol, and Secret Service
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
Prohibits federal law enforcement agencies from using drones to conduct surveillance of U.S. citizens except with consent, warrant, or in high-risk terrorist situations
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Restrict federal law enforcement drone surveillance capabilities to protect privacy while maintaining exceptions for national security and judicial oversight"
Likely Beneficiaries
- U.S. citizens concerned about privacy rights
- Civil liberties advocacy groups
- Privacy advocates
- Property owners concerned about government surveillance
Likely Burden Bearers
- Federal law enforcement agencies (FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE, Border Patrol)
- Department of Homeland Security
- Law enforcement agencies that rely on drone technology for investigations
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_president"
- → President of the United States
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of Homeland Security
- "federal_law_enforcement_agency"
- → Any federal agency with law enforcement powers (e.g., FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE)
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Intentionally gathering evidence, collecting information, or photographically/electronically recording a specifically targeted U.S. citizen or their private property
Person holding U.S. citizenship (not explicitly defined, relies on standard legal definition)
Drone or remotely piloted aircraft used for surveillance purposes (not explicitly defined but commonly understood)
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology