HR928-119

In Committee

Railway Safety Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill significantly expands state and local law enforcement participation in federal immigration enforcement. It requires states to report information about apprehended aliens to federal authorities, withholds federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate, and mandates that the federal government take custody of undocumented immigrants within 48 hours of state/local request.

Who Benefits and How

State and local law enforcement agencies benefit from federal grants for immigration enforcement equipment and training, plus reimbursement for costs of detaining and transporting immigrants. Private prison and detention facility operators benefit from the mandate to construct 20 new detention facilities. Federal immigration enforcement agencies (DHS, ICE) gain expanded cooperation and resources. Law enforcement officers receive immunity from civil liability for immigration enforcement activities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary cities and states face loss of federal SCAAP (State Criminal Alien Assistance Program) funds if they maintain policies limiting immigration cooperation. Immigrant communities face increased surveillance and detention. State and local governments bear administrative burdens of collecting and reporting alien information. Taxpayers fund expanded detention infrastructure and reimbursements to states.

Key Provisions

  • States must report detailed information about apprehended aliens (name, address, photo, fingerprints) to DHS or lose federal funding
  • Federal government must take custody of aliens within 48 hours when state/local authorities request
  • DHS must construct or acquire 20 new detention facilities across the United States
  • State/local law enforcement officers receive immunity from civil rights lawsuits for immigration enforcement
  • Institutional Removal Program identifying criminal aliens in prisons extended to all states

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Enhances state and local law enforcement participation in federal immigration enforcement by mandating information sharing, withholding federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, providing grants and training, expanding detention capacity, and granting immunity to officers enforcing immigration laws.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Law Enforcement, Federal-State Relations, Civil Rights

Primary Purpose

Enhances state and local law enforcement participation in federal immigration enforcement by mandating information sharing, withholding federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, providing grants and training, expanding detention capacity, and granting immunity to officers enforcing immigration laws.

Policy Domains

Immigration Law Enforcement Federal-State Relations Civil Rights

Enhanced State and Local Immigration Enforcement

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • State and local law enforcement agencies
  • Private detention facility operators
  • Federal immigration enforcement agencies
  • Immigration enforcement advocates
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Sanctuary cities and states
  • Undocumented immigrants
  • Taxpayers
  • Immigrant advocacy organizations
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 4, 2025

Mr. Deluzio (for himself, Mr. LaLota, Mr. Rulli, and Mr. …

Feb 4, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.

Feb 4, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …

Feb 4, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
18 mentions across 8 clauses
+10 positive -8 negative

Class I freight railroads, Class II and III railroads, Defect detector manufacturers

Positive-direction: Defect detector manufacturers, Railroad conductors and engineers, Railroad mechanical inspectors, Railroad safety technology companies, Railroads seeking safety improvement grants, Small railroads under M revenue, Tank car manufacturers, Tank car retrofit companies, Wayside defect detector manufacturers

Negative-direction: Class I freight railroads, Class II and III railroads, Owners of DOT-111 tank cars

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Labor
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Railroad labor unions, Railroad labor unions (BLET, SMART-TD)

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Local fire departments and first responders, State and tribal emergency response commissions

Positive-direction: Local fire departments and first responders

Negative-direction: State and tribal emergency response commissions

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Hazardous materials shippers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Communities along rail corridors

Oil & Gas
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Oil and gas shippers

Educational Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Hazmat training providers

11/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Law Enforcement Federal-State Relations
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
"the_commissioner"
→ Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"alien who is unlawfully present in the United States" §H710141F2AD3049CEAC6CCD5A7E2E9ED5

An alien who entered without inspection, failed to maintain nonimmigrant status, failed to comply with immigrant status requirements, or failed to depart under voluntary departure agreement or final removal order

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology