HR9221-118

Introduced

To amend title 35, United States Code, to establish a rebuttable presumption that a permanent injunction should be granted in certain circumstances, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Jul 30, 2024

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill, To amend title 35, United States Code, to establish a rebuttable presumption that a permanent injunction should be granted in certain circumstances, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting schools, students, and education providers. The main policy domain is Education, Defense, Environment.

Who Benefits and How

schools, students, and education providers may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.

Who Bears the Burden and How

federal implementing agencies, schools, students, and education providers may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.

Key Provisions

  • Section HF473EC696DFC4E37AEE7908445B126C4: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Realizing Engineering, Science, and Technology Opportunities by Restoring Exclusive Patent Rights Act of 2024 or...
  • Section HA08FD10E9BC942E4A8158DBC5FB43797: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: Securing effective and reliable patent protection for new technologies is critical to maintaining the competitive...
  • Section HB4D941F88E3D4AC2BB22685FC618B7A4: 3. Rebuttable presumption that injunctive relief is warranted Section 283 of title 35, United States Code, is amended— by striking The several and inserting...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

This bill, To amend title 35, United States Code, to establish a rebuttable presumption that a permanent injunction should be granted in certain circumstances, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting schools, students, and education providers.

Key Policy Areas

Education, Defense, Environment

Primary Purpose

This bill, To amend title 35, United States Code, to establish a rebuttable presumption that a permanent injunction should be granted in certain circumstances, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting schools, students, and education providers.

Policy Domains

Education Defense Environment

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • schools, students, and education providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
schools, students, and education providers: ,
Identified Costs
  • federal implementing agencies
  • schools, students, and education providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
federal implementing agencies: ,
schools, students, and education providers: ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 30, 2024

Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Roy, Ms. Ross, Mr. Johnson …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education Defense Environment
Actor Mappings
"federal_implementing_agencies"
→ Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology