HR9140-119

In Committee

MEDIC Careers Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jun 4, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The MEDIC Careers Act of 2026 would require the Defense and, for the Coast Guard when outside the Navy, Homeland Security secretaries to develop recommendations for helping military medics enter civilian health care occupations. The work would be done in consultation with states and the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Health and Human Services, and Labor. Within 180 days of enactment, each responsible secretary would have to report the recommendations and an implementation plan to specified congressional committees.

The review would identify barriers to translating military training into civilian credentials, standardizing medic experience across the services, obtaining civilian credentials before separation, expanding bridge programs, increasing health-sector SkillBridge access, and improving state-by-state licensing information in transition services. Officials would consider state clarification of equivalent credentials, state incentives for bridge programs, alignment of military and civilian credentials, and tracking of former military health personnel who remain in the civilian sector. These are recommendations for consideration; the bill would not itself override state licensing rules, award a civilian credential, or require an employer to hire a separating medic.

The bill would also rewrite the Health Care Workforce Preparedness and Response Pilot Program. The Defense Department would award grants to qualifying public or private nonprofit health care providers located in medically underserved areas. An applicant would have to own or operate, or belong to a consortium including, a rural health clinic, nursing home, facility in a health professional shortage area, federally qualified health center, or other covered health care facility.

Grant recipients could use funds to hire and retain separating or recently separated service members, help them while they obtain licenses or certifications, provide required training, and coordinate with Defense transition programs. The initial grant period would last three years and could be renewed for up to two one-year periods if money remains. A recipient could receive no more than $600,000 for the initial period and $200,000 for each renewal, for a maximum of $1 million over five years. Rural providers would have to be adequately represented among awards.

The measure would authorize, but not itself appropriate, $5 million per year for fiscal years 2027 through 2031, totaling $25 million. Defense could use no more than 10 percent of annual appropriations for administration. Recipients would submit periodic evaluations, and Defense would publish and submit program-success reports beginning within two years of enactment and at least annually thereafter.

Who Benefits and How

Separating military medics could receive clearer credential pathways, bridge training, licensing support, and employment assistance. Recently separated service members could also qualify for help under provider grant programs. Eligible nonprofit rural clinics, nursing homes, federally qualified health centers, and shortage-area facilities could receive funding for recruitment, training, and retention. Medically underserved and rural communities could gain health workers if participating providers successfully fill vacancies.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The responsible military departments and consulted federal agencies would perform the barrier review, coordinate with states, develop an implementation plan, administer grants, and report results. Grant applicants and recipients would prepare detailed applications, sustainability plans, periodic evaluations, and licensing or training programs. Federal taxpayers would finance amounts later appropriated under the $25 million authorization. Providers that are for-profit or outside a medically underserved area would not qualify.

Key Provisions

  • Requires recommendations on translating military medic experience into civilian credentials.
  • Requires a congressional report and implementation plan within 180 days.
  • Establishes Defense grants for qualifying nonprofit providers in underserved areas.
  • Funds hiring, retention, licensing support, training, and transition coordination.
  • Caps an initial three-year grant at $600,000 and each of two renewals at $200,000.
  • Requires adequate representation of rural providers among grant awards.
  • Authorizes $25 million over FY2027-FY2031, subject to later appropriations.
  • Requires recipient evaluations and recurring public Defense Department reports.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Improve military medics' transition into civilian health care employment through interagency recommendations and a Defense Department grant pilot for qualifying nonprofit health care providers in medically underserved areas.

Key Policy Areas

Military Personnel, Health Care Workforce, Veterans, Occupational Licensing, Federal Grants, Rural Health

Primary Purpose

Improve military medics' transition into civilian health care employment through interagency recommendations and a Defense Department grant pilot for qualifying nonprofit health care providers in medically underserved areas.

Policy Domains

Military Personnel Health Care Workforce Veterans Occupational Licensing Federal Grants Rural Health

Sections 2-3 - military medic transition planning and health workforce grants

Identified Gains
  • Separating military medics
  • Recently separated service members seeking health care work
  • Eligible nonprofit health care providers
  • Rural health care providers
  • Medically underserved communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Separating military medics: , ,
Rural health care providers: , ,
Medically underserved communities: , ,
Eligible nonprofit health care providers: , ,
Recently separated service members seeking health care work: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Military departments developing transition recommendations
  • Federal agencies consulted on medic workforce transitions
  • Health care grant applicants
  • Health care grant recipients with reporting duties
  • Defense Department pilot administrators
  • Federal taxpayers financing workforce grants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Health care grant applicants: , ,
Defense Department pilot administrators: , ,
Federal taxpayers financing workforce grants: , ,
Health care grant recipients with reporting duties: , ,
Federal agencies consulted on medic workforce transitions: , ,
Military departments developing transition recommendations: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 4, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Jun 4, 2026

Introduced in House

Jun 4, 2026

Ms. Dexter (for herself and Mr. Hamadeh of Arizona) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Military
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Military departments developing medic transition recommendations, Recently separated service members seeking health care work, Separating military medics

Positive-direction: Recently separated service members seeking health care work, Separating service members seeking health care work

Negative-direction: Military departments developing medic transition recommendations

Health Care Providers
4 mentions across 1 clause
+4 positive

Eligible nonprofit health care providers, Health care grant recipients with reporting duties, Nonprofit federally qualified health centers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Defense Department pilot administrators, Federal agencies consulted on medic workforce transitions

Positive-direction: Defense Department pilot administrators

Negative-direction: Federal agencies consulted on medic workforce transitions

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Medically underserved communities

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal taxpayers financing workforce grants

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Military Personnel Health Care Workforce Veterans Occupational Licensing Federal Grants Rural Health
Actor Mappings
"medics"
→ Separating and recently separated military medics
"states"
→ State licensing and credentialing authorities
"providers"
→ Eligible nonprofit health care providers
"taxpayers"
→ Federal taxpayers
"communities"
→ Medically underserved and rural communities
"consulted_agencies"
→ Veterans Affairs, Health and Human Services, and Labor officials
"military_departments"
→ Defense and Homeland Security military-service officials

Note: {'scope_ids': ['military_medic_civilian_health_workforce'], 'description': 'The transition provision requires recommendations rather than automatic civilian licensure or hiring, and the $25 million pilot figure is an authorization subject to later appropriations, competitive eligibility, grant caps, and reporting conditions.'}

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"medic" §medic

A member of the Armed Forces serving in a clinical health care-related occupation.

"eligible provider" §eligible_provider

A public or private nonprofit health care provider in a medically underserved area that owns, operates, or joins a consortium with one of the listed facility types.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology