HR907-119

Introduced

To provide for the settlement of the water rights claims of the Fort Belknap Indian Community, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 31, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill, To provide for the settlement of the water rights claims of the Fort Belknap Indian Community, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users. The main policy domain is Environment, Government Operations, Finance.

Who Benefits and How

environmental regulators and natural-resource users may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.

Who Bears the Burden and How

federal implementing agencies, environmental regulators and natural-resource users may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.

Key Provisions

  • Section H604C3F1533034A5A885777958204ADE9: 1. Short title; table of contents This Act may be cited as the Northern Montana Water Security Act of 2025. The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
  • Section HEDED5C558F034D65BABB50F6401D3FE6: 101. Short title This title may be cited as the Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025.
  • Section H162E04963F684B689E1BE603779B0CAF: 102. Purposes The purposes of this title are— to achieve a fair, equitable, and final settlement of claims to water rights in the State of Montana for— the...
  • Section H95C0811C51094B7D9A61287D21319A76: 103. Definitions In this title: The term allottee means an individual who holds a beneficial real property interest in an allotment of Indian land that is—...
  • Section HC5AC27395E6B4170BE718ACFF61926CF: 104. Ratification of Compact As modified by this title, the Compact is authorized, ratified, and confirmed. Any amendment to the Compact is authorized,...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

This bill, To provide for the settlement of the water rights claims of the Fort Belknap Indian Community, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.

Key Policy Areas

Environment, Government Operations, Finance

Primary Purpose

This bill, To provide for the settlement of the water rights claims of the Fort Belknap Indian Community, and for other purposes., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.

Policy Domains

Environment Government Operations Finance

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
environmental regulators and natural-resource users:
Identified Costs
  • federal implementing agencies
  • environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
federal implementing agencies:
environmental regulators and natural-resource users:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 31, 2025

Mr. Zinke (for himself and Mr. Downing) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Tribal Nations
11 mentions across 11 clauses
+9 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, Fort Belknap Indian Community, Fort Belknap Indian Community (Aaniiih Nakoda and White Clay nations)

Fort Belknap Indian Community faces effects in multiple directions

Government
5 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -3 negative ?1 uncertain

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation

Positive-direction: Fort Belknap Indian Community and the State of Montana

Negative-direction: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Local county governments in Montana, Montana State Government, State of Montana (for land exchange)

Positive-direction: State of Montana (for land exchange)

Negative-direction: Local county governments in Montana, Montana State Government

Water, Sewage, And Other Systems
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Malta Irrigation District

Agriculture
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Existing leaseholders and permit holders on transferred lands

Mining
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Mining companies (on withdrawn federal lands)

Gambling Industries
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Gaming operators

-1 negative

U.S. Department of the Interior (Secretary)

15/18
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environment Government Operations Finance
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ The commission identified in the operative section
"secretary_of_energy"
→ Secretary of Energy
"secretary_of_treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"secretary_of_agriculture"
→ Secretary of Agriculture

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Secretary" §H95C0811C51094B7D9A61287D21319A76

the Secretary of the Interior. The term St. Mary Unit means the St. Mary Storage Unit of the Milk River Project authorized by Congress on March 25, 1905. The term St. Mary Unit includes— Sherburne Dam and Reservoir

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology