HR8888-119

In Committee

Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act

119th Congress Introduced May 19, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires no validity or enforceability of arbitration agreements for consumer and civil rights disputes Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 24324.Prohibition on and requires prohibition on mandatory arbitration The purposes of this section are— to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, exemptions, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Veterans, Education, Healthcare, and Transportation.

Who Benefits and How

Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, Transportation operators and users affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, and Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires no validity or enforceability of arbitration agreements for consumer and civil rights disputes Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 24324.Prohibition on...
  • Requires prohibition on mandatory arbitration The purposes of this section are— to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires no validity or enforceability of arbitration agreements for consumer and civil rights disputes Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 24324.Prohibition on and requires prohibition on mandatory arbitration The purposes of this section are— to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers.

Key Policy Areas

Veterans, Education, Healthcare, Transportation

Primary Purpose

The bill requires no validity or enforceability of arbitration agreements for consumer and civil rights disputes Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 24324.Prohibition on and requires prohibition on mandatory arbitration The purposes of this section are— to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers.

Policy Domains

Veterans Education Healthcare Transportation

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill
  • Transportation operators and users affected by the bill
  • Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
  • Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill: ,
Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill: ,
Transportation operators and users affected by the bill: ,
Educational institutions and students affected by the bill: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 19, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

May 19, 2026

Introduced in House

May 19, 2026

Mr. Deluzio (for himself and Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania) introduced …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Veterans Education Healthcare Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology