HR845-119

Passed House

Pet and Livestock Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 31, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Pet and Livestock Protection Act directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue, within 60 days, the November 3, 2020 final rule titled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. That rule removed the gray wolf from federal endangered and threatened wildlife protections. The bill then states that the reissued rule is not subject to judicial review, so challengers cannot use the courts to attack the reissuance.

Who Benefits and How

Ranchers, livestock producers, pet owners in wolf habitat areas, state fish and wildlife agencies, hunting outfitters, wildlife management services, and Interior officials implementing the 2020 rule benefit because delisting restores greater state management authority and reduces federal litigation risk around the reissued rule. Federal courts also benefit from being barred from hearing challenges to the reissuance.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Wildlife conservation organizations, environmental litigants, gray wolf recovery advocates, and states preferring stronger federal wolf protections bear the burden because the bill weakens federal Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves and bars judicial review of the reissued delisting rule. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff must reissue the rule on a 60-day deadline.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the Interior Secretary to reissue the November 3, 2020 gray wolf delisting rule within 60 days.
  • Removes gray wolves from the federal endangered and threatened wildlife list through reissuance of that rule.
  • Restores greater state fish and wildlife management authority over gray wolves after delisting.
  • Bars judicial review of the reissued delisting rule.
  • Limits conservation litigants' ability to challenge the reissuance in federal court.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue within 60 days the November 3, 2020 final rule delisting the gray wolf from endangered and threatened wildlife protections, and bars judicial review of that reissued rule.

Key Policy Areas

Wildlife, Endangered Species Act, Agriculture, Judicial Review

Primary Purpose

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue within 60 days the November 3, 2020 final rule delisting the gray wolf from endangered and threatened wildlife protections, and bars judicial review of that reissued rule.

Policy Domains

Wildlife Endangered Species Act Agriculture Judicial Review

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Ranchers
  • Livestock producers
  • Pet owners in wolf habitat areas
  • State fish and wildlife agencies
  • Hunting outfitters
  • Wildlife management services
  • Interior officials
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Ranchers: , , ,
Federal courts: , , ,
Hunting outfitters: , , ,
Interior officials: , , ,
Livestock producers: , , ,
Wildlife management services: , , ,
Pet owners in wolf habitat areas: , , ,
State fish and wildlife agencies: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Wildlife conservation organizations
  • Environmental litigants
  • Gray wolf recovery advocates
  • States preferring stronger federal wolf protections
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Environmental litigants: , , ,
Gray wolf recovery advocates: , , ,
Wildlife conservation organizations: , , ,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff: , , ,
States preferring stronger federal wolf protections: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 18, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment …

Dec 18, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Dec 18, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Dec 18, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - …

Dec 18, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Dec 18, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Dec 18, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6070-6072)

Dec 18, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …

Dec 18, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Dec 18, 2025

Mr. Huffman moved to recommit to the Committee on Natural …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
8 mentions across 5 clauses
+8 positive

Livestock producers, Ranchers, Ranchers and livestock producers

Government
8 mentions across 5 clauses
+7 positive -1 negative

Department of the Interior, Department of the Interior litigators, Federal courts

Positive-direction: Department of the Interior, Department of the Interior litigators, Federal courts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Negative-direction: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff

Environment
6 mentions across 5 clauses
-6 negative

Gray wolf recovery advocates, Wildlife conservation organizations, Wildlife conservation organizations and environmental litigants

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive ?1 uncertain

State fish agencies, State fish and wildlife agencies, State wildlife agencies

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Environmental litigants

Outdoor Recreation
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Hunting outfitters, Wildlife management services

Recreation / Hunting
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Hunting outfitters and wildlife management services

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Wildlife Endangered Species Act Agriculture Judicial Review
Actor Mappings
"esa"
→ Endangered Species Act
"fws"
→ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
"interior"
→ Secretary of the Interior

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology