Criminal History Access Act of 2026
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Criminal History Access Act of 2026 amends 28 U.S.C. 534, the FBI criminal-identification records statute. It updates the FBI's authority to exchange records and information with authorized officials of the federal government, including the United States Sentencing Commission; states, including state sentencing commissions and peace officer standards and training agencies; Indian tribes; cities; and penal and other institutions. It adds definitions for peace officer standards and training agency, meaning a state agency with statutory authority to set standards for hiring, training, ethical conduct, and retention of law enforcement officers through certification, licensing, or similar qualification processes. It also defines state to include the several states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and other territories or possessions. The Attorney General must implement the Act within 180 days.
Who Benefits and How
State sentencing commissions benefit from clearer access to FBI criminal-history records for official use. Peace officer standards agencies benefit because criminal-history information can support officer hiring, certification, licensing, discipline, and retention standards. The United States Sentencing Commission benefits from explicit access as an authorized federal official. Tribal justice agencies benefit from inclusion in the record-exchange authority. Penal institutions benefit from continued access for official use. Public-safety oversight bodies benefit if improved record exchange helps identify disqualifying criminal history.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division must implement expanded exchange authority and access controls. The Attorney General must implement the Act within 180 days. State agencies receiving records must use them only for official purposes and protect criminal-history information. Peace officer standards agencies must integrate records into certification or licensing processes. Tribal and territorial agencies may need agreements, access systems, and safeguards. Individuals with criminal histories may face more scrutiny in sentencing, officer certification, or institutional decisions.
Key Provisions
- Expands FBI criminal-history record exchange to authorized federal officials, states, Indian tribes, cities, and penal institutions.
- Adds the United States Sentencing Commission, state sentencing commissions, and peace officer standards agencies.
- Adds a peace officer standards agency definition tied to officer hiring, training, ethics, certification, licensing, and retention.
- Adds a state definition covering the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, territories, and possessions.
- Requires Attorney General implementation within 180 days.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Expands FBI criminal-history record exchange under 28 U.S.C. 534 to include authorized federal officials such as the United States Sentencing Commission, states including sentencing commissions and peace officer standards agencies, Indian tribes, cities, and penal or other institutions; defines peace officer standards agencies and state to include territories and possessions; and requires the Attorney General within 180 days to implement the new access rules.
Key Policy Areas
Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement, FBI, State Governments
Primary Purpose
Expands FBI criminal-history record exchange under 28 U.S.C. 534 to include authorized federal officials such as the United States Sentencing Commission, states including sentencing commissions and peace officer standards agencies, Indian tribes, cities, and penal or other institutions; defines peace officer standards agencies and state to include territories and possessions; and requires the Attorney General within 180 days to implement the new access rules.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- State sentencing commissions
- Peace officer standards agencies
- United States Sentencing Commission
- Tribal justice agencies
- Penal institutions
- Public safety oversight bodies
Identified Costs
- FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division
- Attorney General
- State agencies receiving records
- Peace officer standards agencies
- Tribal agencies receiving records
- Individuals with criminal histories
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Mr. Schmidt moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3370-3372)
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 553.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-636.
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Individuals with criminal histories, Peace officer standards agencies, State sentencing commissions
Positive-direction: Peace officer standards agencies, State sentencing commissions
Negative-direction: Individuals with criminal histories
FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division, United States Sentencing Commission
Positive-direction: United States Sentencing Commission
Negative-direction: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ag"
- → Attorney General
- "fbi"
- → Federal Bureau of Investigation
- "commission"
- → United States Sentencing Commission
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology