Export Control Enforcement and Enhancement Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Export Control Enforcement and Enhancement Act amends the Export Control Reform Act to add an expedited process for changes to the Entity List. Any member of the End-User Review Committee may submit a proposal directly to the committee requesting a vote by all members on additions, removals, or other modifications. The committee must vote to approve or disapprove within 30 days after submission, unless the chair and the proposing member agree that more information is needed and suspend the period for an additional 15 days. An entity may be added by majority vote if the committee determines that it has engaged, is engaged, or is at risk of engaging in activities contrary to U.S. national-security or foreign-policy interests. For entities added under the new subsection, license applications to export, reexport, or transfer items subject to the Export Administration Regulations are subject to a presumption of denial unless the members who voted to add the entity agree by majority vote not to apply that policy. The bill also requires annual reports to Congress on proposal counts, approvals, disapprovals, nonfinal proposals, and average vote timing.
Who Benefits and How
End-User Review Committee members benefit from a direct path to force votes on Entity List changes. BIS Entity List staff benefit from clearer timelines and reporting rules. National-security agencies benefit from faster action against entities that present U.S. security or foreign-policy risks. Congressional export-control overseers benefit from annual data on proposal handling and vote timing. U.S. exporters benefit from clearer licensing policy for entities added through the expedited process. Competitors of risky foreign entities benefit if export restrictions reduce access to U.S.-origin items.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Entities proposed for listing face faster review and possible presumption-of-denial licensing treatment. Exporters dealing with newly listed entities face higher compliance costs and likely license denials. End-User Review Committee staff must vote within 30 days or manage a narrow 15-day extension. The committee chair must decide whether additional information justifies suspension with the proposing member. BIS licensing officers must apply the presumption-of-denial policy unless voting members create an exception. Annual report preparers must collect proposal and timing data for Congress.
Key Provisions
- Allows any End-User Review Committee member to submit Entity List addition, removal, or modification proposals directly to the committee.
- Requires approval or disapproval votes within 30 days after proposal submission.
- Allows a 15-day extension only when the chair and proposing member determine more information is needed.
- Allows Entity List additions by majority vote based on national-security or foreign-policy risk.
- Applies a presumption-of-denial licensing policy for entities added under the expedited process unless voting members agree otherwise.
- Requires annual congressional reports on proposal volume, approval, disapproval, pending action, and average vote timing.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates an expedited End-User Review Committee process for Entity List additions, removals, and modifications by allowing any committee member to submit proposals directly for a vote within 30 days, allowing a 15-day information extension with chair and proposer concurrence, requiring majority-vote findings for additions based on national-security or foreign-policy risk, applying a presumption-of-denial licensing policy to newly listed entities unless voting members choose otherwise, and requiring annual congressional reports on proposal volume, approval, disapproval, nonfinal actions, and average vote timing.
Key Policy Areas
Export Controls, Entity List, National Security, Trade Compliance
Primary Purpose
Creates an expedited End-User Review Committee process for Entity List additions, removals, and modifications by allowing any committee member to submit proposals directly for a vote within 30 days, allowing a 15-day information extension with chair and proposer concurrence, requiring majority-vote findings for additions based on national-security or foreign-policy risk, applying a presumption-of-denial licensing policy to newly listed entities unless voting members choose otherwise, and requiring annual congressional reports on proposal volume, approval, disapproval, nonfinal actions, and average vote timing.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- End User Review Committee members
- BIS Entity List staff
- National security agencies
- Congressional export control overseers
- U.S. exporters with compliance clarity
- Competitors of risky foreign entities
Identified Costs
- Entities proposed for listing
- Exporters dealing with listed entities
- End User Review Committee staff
- End User Review Committee chair
- BIS licensing officers
- Annual report preparers
Sponsors
Ann Wagner
R-MO | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
ReportedOrdered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Mrs. Wagner introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
BIS Entity List staff, BIS licensing officers, Congressional export control overseers
Positive-direction: Congressional export control overseers, End User Review Committee members, National security agencies
Negative-direction: BIS Entity List staff, BIS licensing officers
Entities proposed for listing, Exporters dealing with listed entities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "bis"
- → BIS Entity List staff
- "chair"
- → End-User Review Committee chair
- "committee"
- → End-User Review Committee
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology