To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of environmental remediation costs.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of environmental remediation costs., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users. The main policy domain is Environment, Foreign Policy.
Who Benefits and How
environmental regulators and natural-resource users may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies, environmental regulators and natural-resource users may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section H265B55F60B4A470C9C02D61A3676A14B: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Brownfields Redevelopment Tax Incentive Reauthorization Act of 2025.
- Section H962231F9711845748862BC291DD0C879: 2. Extension of expensing of environmental remediation costs Section 198(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking incurred after December...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of environmental remediation costs., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Foreign Policy
Primary Purpose
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of environmental remediation costs., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Sherrill (for herself and Mr. Turner of Ohio) introduced …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "federal_implementing_agencies"
- → Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology