Restoring Executive Branch Authorities to Oversee Offices of the United States Attorneys Act of 2026
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Restoring Executive Branch Authorities to Oversee Offices of the United States Attorneys Act of 2026 changes title 28 section 546, which governs interim United States attorney appointments. It clarifies that the 120-day limit in subsection (c)(2) applies after appointment of that person, and it strikes subsection (d). Because subsection (d) is the provision allowing district courts to appoint a United States attorney when an Attorney General interim appointment expires, the bill removes the court-continuation mechanism and leaves interim U.S. attorney vacancy control with executive-branch appointment rules until a presidentially nominated, Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney is in place.
Who Benefits and How
The Attorney General benefits because the bill preserves executive-branch control over interim U.S. attorney vacancies instead of allowing district courts to continue appointments. Justice Department leadership benefits from clearer authority over leadership transitions in U.S. attorney offices. Presidential appointment staff benefit because the path to permanent U.S. attorneys is reinforced through nomination and Senate confirmation rather than court appointment. Senate Judiciary Committee members benefit from stronger incentives to resolve nominations. Defendants and civil litigants benefit from clearer lines of accountability for U.S. attorney leadership. Executive-branch accountability advocates benefit from removal of judicial appointment authority over prosecutors.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal district courts lose the authority to appoint interim United States attorneys after an Attorney General appointment expires. U.S. attorney offices may face leadership uncertainty if the executive branch and Senate do not resolve vacancies before interim appointment limits run. Career prosecutors in affected districts may have to operate under acting or temporary leadership structures. Senators opposing nominees lose leverage created by the possibility of court-appointed successors. Court-administration staff no longer manage U.S. attorney appointment orders. Communities served by U.S. attorney offices may bear uncertainty during vacancy disputes.
Key Provisions
- Amends the 120-day interim U.S. attorney tenure language in 28 U.S.C. 546(c)(2).
- Repeals 28 U.S.C. 546(d), which authorizes district-court appointment after an interim appointment expires.
- Directs vacancy control toward executive-branch appointment and Senate-confirmed permanent appointments.
- Blocks federal court authority to continue U.S. attorney service through judicial appointment.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Amends 28 U.S.C. 546 to remove judicial appointment authority for interim United States attorneys by striking subsection (d) and clarifying that the 120-day tenure limit applies to the person appointed by the Attorney General, shifting oversight of U.S. attorney vacancies back toward executive-branch appointment and away from district-court continuation appointments.
Key Policy Areas
Justice Department, Federal Courts, Executive Appointments, Criminal Justice
Primary Purpose
Amends 28 U.S.C. 546 to remove judicial appointment authority for interim United States attorneys by striking subsection (d) and clarifying that the 120-day tenure limit applies to the person appointed by the Attorney General, shifting oversight of U.S. attorney vacancies back toward executive-branch appointment and away from district-court continuation appointments.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Attorney General
- Justice Department leadership
- Presidential appointment staff
- Senate Judiciary Committee members
- Defendants in federal cases
- Executive branch accountability advocates
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Federal district courts
- U.S. attorney offices
- Career federal prosecutors
- Senators opposing U.S. attorney nominees
- Court administration staff
- Communities served by U.S. attorney offices
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Mr. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ag"
- → Attorney General
- "doj"
- → Department of Justice
- "courts"
- → Federal district courts
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology