To modify the penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Telecommunications, Criminal Justice, and Technology.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Telecommunications, Criminal Justice, Technology
Primary Purpose
The bill requires penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill
- Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Kustoff (for himself and Ms. Ross) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology