HR798-118

Introduced

To improve protections for meatpacking workers, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Feb 2, 2023

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires findings Congress finds that— meat and poultry slaughter and processing is a particularly dangerous occupation, with meat and poultry processing workers suffering injuries at measurably higher rates than, defines definitions In this Act: The term covered establishment means— an official establishment (as defined in section 301.2 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)) that is subject, and requires rule on increased line speeds at meat and poultry establishments. It relies on compliance mandates, reporting requirements, definition changes, and product standards. The main policy areas are Business, Finance, Criminal Justice, and Environment.

Who Benefits and How

Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk, Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, and Businesses and employers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Businesses and employers affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires findings Congress finds that— meat and poultry slaughter and processing is a particularly dangerous occupation, with meat and poultry processing workers suffering injuries at measurably higher rates than...
  • Defines definitions In this Act: The term covered establishment means— an official establishment (as defined in section 301.2 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)) that is subject...
  • Requires rule on increased line speeds at meat and poultry establishments.
  • Requires definitions In this subtitle: The term covered entity— has the meaning given the term respondent in section 701(n) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
  • Requires requirements for employers relating to no fault attendance policies or attendance systems It shall be considered an unlawful employment practice for a covered entity to maintain a no fault attendance policy...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires findings Congress finds that— meat and poultry slaughter and processing is a particularly dangerous occupation, with meat and poultry processing workers suffering injuries at measurably higher rates than, defines definitions In this Act: The term covered establishment means— an official establishment (as defined in section 301.2 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)) that is subject, and requires rule on increased line speeds at meat and poultry establishments.

Key Policy Areas

Business, Finance, Criminal Justice, Environment

Primary Purpose

The bill requires findings Congress finds that— meat and poultry slaughter and processing is a particularly dangerous occupation, with meat and poultry processing workers suffering injuries at measurably higher rates than, defines definitions In this Act: The term covered establishment means— an official establishment (as defined in section 301.2 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)) that is subject, and requires rule on increased line speeds at meat and poultry establishments.

Policy Domains

Business Finance Criminal Justice Environment

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
  • Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
  • Businesses and employers affected by the bill
  • Agricultural producers and rural communities affected by the bill
  • Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Businesses and employers affected by the bill: , ,
Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill: ,
Agricultural producers and rural communities affected by the bill: , ,
Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill: , , ,
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
  • Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
  • Businesses and employers affected by the bill
  • Disaster response agencies and disaster-affected communities
  • Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Businesses and employers affected by the bill: , , , , , ,
Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill: , ,
Disaster response agencies and disaster-affected communities: , , ,
Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill: , , , , , ,
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2023

Mr. Khanna (for himself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Payne, Mr. Grijalva, …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Business Finance Criminal Justice Environment

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology