Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting federal agencies and legislative administrators. The main policy domain is Government Operations, Criminal Justice, Transportation.
Who Benefits and How
federal agencies and legislative administrators may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section HF0C93E69D57E43FBA93F83C2D556FA5B: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act.
- Section H0A69326755FE45FEAF6D344783794DB3: 2. Findings Congress makes the following findings: Under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, the Department of Defense is authorized to provide...
- Section HE4897404BF5D4C419AFC3282BCC7B782: 3. Limitation on Department of Defense transfer of personal property to local law enforcement agencies Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting federal agencies and legislative administrators.
Key Policy Areas
Government Operations, Criminal Justice, Transportation
Primary Purpose
This bill, Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting federal agencies and legislative administrators.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- federal agencies and legislative administrators
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Introduced in House
Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Carson, Mr. Davis …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "secretary_of_defense"
- → Secretary of Defense
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology