KIDS Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The KIDS Act combines several online-safety bills into one federal framework covering minors under 17, with some stricter rules for children under 13. It regulates pornography-focused platforms, large interactive content platforms, messaging features, online video games, and consumer chatbots. It also directs federal studies, public education, and a temporary Commerce Department partnership, and gives the Federal Trade Commission and State officials enforcement authority.
The SCREEN Act title applies to public platforms that knowingly make sexual material harmful to minors available and devote more than one-third of their material to it. Beginning one year after enactment, those platforms must use commercially available age-verification technology reasonably designed for accuracy and block minors from covered material. Self-attestation is insufficient. Platforms and contractors must explain the verification process, address circumvention, minimize retention and disclosure of verification data, and maintain administrative, technical, and physical security. The title does not require government-issued identification. The FTC must consult computer scientists, child-safety advocates, privacy specialists, verification vendors, security experts, and cryptographers. GAO must evaluate effectiveness, compliance, privacy, security, speech, behavioral, economic, psychological, and social effects after three years.
The Kids Online Safety Act subtitle covers publicly available interactive platforms whose primary purpose is sharing user-generated content, which use engagement features and personal information for advertising, marketing, or recommendations. Providers must maintain reasonable policies addressing severe threats of violence, sexual exploitation and abuse, illegal or age-restricted drugs and products, gambling, alcohol, and deceptive financial harm. The text does not create a general duty of care and does not require platforms to block a minor's deliberate search or request for content or access to prevention resources.
Known minor users must receive easy controls to limit contact, prevent profile recommendations to adults, reduce compulsive design features, restrict geolocation sharing, and opt out of or limit personalized recommendations. The most protective privacy and safety choices must be defaults. Parents must be able to view and change account settings, restrict purchases, monitor and limit time, and use the same safety controls. Children under 13 receive the most protective parental-tool defaults, subject to a transition for parents who previously opted out. Interfaces may not be designed to impair use of safeguards. Platforms must provide age-appropriate controls in the same language and format as the service and notify minors when parental tools operate.
Platforms must offer a child-harm reporting channel, a dedicated electronic contact, receipt confirmation, and a substantive response within ten days or as promptly as needed for an imminent threat. Before a known minor registers or buys something, the platform must explain its safeguards and parental tools. It must notify a parent and obtain verifiable parental consent, with a safe harbor for compliance through COPPA procedures. Paid endorsements shown to minors require clear labels, and platforms may not facilitate ads to known minors for narcotics, cannabis, tobacco, gambling, or alcohol.
Every covered platform must obtain an independent third-party audit within 18 months and annually thereafter. Auditors must assess minor access, child-versus-teen differences, known minor user counts, time spent, harm policies, use of safeguards and parental tools, reports received, handling of reports, minor-data practices, and design-feature review. Providers must supply relevant information, systems access, and material facts. Audit results go to the FTC within 30 days, and selected metrics become public within 45 days. This subtitle does not itself require age gating or age verification.
The Safe Messaging for Kids title prohibits ephemeral messaging for every known minor and direct messaging for known children under 13. Platforms that offer direct messaging to known teens must provide parents with accessible controls. Defaults let a parent approve unapproved contacts, manage approved contacts, receive age-change notices, disable messaging, block users or groups, and let a teen hide a profile, online status, and messaging access. Platforms may not degrade unrelated functionality merely because controls are active and must reasonably deter easy circumvention. These duties must be implemented to the maximum technically feasible extent without compromising strong encryption.
The SPY Kids title bars market or product research on known minors unless used solely to improve privacy, security, transparency, or safety or needed for legal compliance. It preserves processing solely for independent or internal measurement of advertising or content performance, reach, and frequency. The messaging and research titles preempt directly overlapping State requirements while preserving generally applicable consumer-protection law, tort, contract, product-liability law, and criminal remedies.
Online video-game providers must give parents easy, default-on, maximally protective controls over communication involving known minor users. They must also let minors and parents prevent profile recommendations to adults, restrict purchases, and limit play time, and must notify minors when controls apply. The title covers digital storefronts, console networks, mobile or cloud gaming platforms, and similar providers of interactive online games.
Consumer chatbot providers must tell known minor users, in plain age-appropriate language, that the chatbot is artificial intelligence rather than a person. They must provide suicide and crisis-line resources when a minor raises suicide or suicidal ideation, prompt a break after three continuous hours, and maintain policies addressing sexual material harmful to minors and promotion of gambling, narcotics, tobacco, or alcohol. A chatbot may not falsely claim to be a licensed professional. The title expressly preserves access to prevention and mitigation resources.
The FTC, HHS, SAMHSA, FDA, DEA, NIH, and NIMH receive study, consultation, education, and reporting duties. Required work covers minors' social-media use and data, mental-health effects, access to fentanyl through social media, industry safety tools, and a four-year longitudinal study of chatbot risks and benefits for loneliness, anxiety, social skills, isolation, depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. The FTC must run a national internet-safety education campaign, report annually for ten years, and publish age-appropriate resources on safe chatbot use.
The Commerce Secretary must establish a Kids Internet Safety Partnership within one year. Its director coordinates agencies, researchers, parents, minors, educators, platforms, civil-liberties experts, and State attorneys general. The Partnership must publish recurring evidence reports and a provider playbook covering age assurance, design features, parental tools, privacy defaults, reporting systems, safety software, recommendation systems, and chatbots. It terminates five years after establishment.
Violations are enforceable by the FTC as unfair or deceptive practices. State attorneys general and designated State officials may sue in federal court for injunctions, compliance, damages, restitution, compensation, or other relief, subject to FTC notice and limits while a federal action against the same defendant is pending. Constitutional challenges may be filed only in the D.C. Circuit, within 90 days for a facial challenge or 60 days after a challenged action.
The enforcement title bars viewpoint-based enforcement and preserves spam filtering, crime prevention, platform security, COPPA, section 230, lawful investigations, legal claims, incident response, encryption, and ordinary data-deletion practices. It prohibits construing the Act to require disclosure of minors' browsing, searches, messages, contacts, communications metadata, decryption capability, weakened security, indefinite retention, or new affirmative collection of age information. A severability clause protects the remainder if one provision is invalidated.
Who Benefits and How
Minors gain safer defaults, reduced exposure to sexual material, illegal-product promotion, exploitative contacts, compulsive features, deceptive transactions, unsafe chatbot behavior, and unmonitored game communications. Parents gain controls over accounts, contact, messaging, purchases, play time, recommendations, and privacy. People using strong encryption retain its protection. Schools, nonprofits, researchers, clinicians, and the public gain education and evidence about online risks and benefits.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Covered platforms, pornography-focused services, messaging providers, game distributors, and chatbot providers must redesign products, add controls and notices, respond to reports, secure verification data, restrict specified activity, and undergo enforcement. Third-party auditors and verification vendors gain work but assume security and compliance duties. The FTC, GAO, Commerce, HHS, FDA, DEA, NIH, NIMH, State attorneys general, and federal courts must administer studies, reports, consultation, guidance, enforcement, and review.
Key Provisions
- Requires privacy-preserving age verification on pornography-focused platforms.
- Prohibits self-attestation as the sole age check.
- Requires protective defaults and parental tools on covered platforms.
- Requires child-harm reporting channels and prompt responses.
- Labels paid endorsements and bars illegal-product advertising to known minors.
- Requires annual independent platform audits and public metrics.
- Prohibits ephemeral messaging for known minors.
- Prohibits direct messaging for known children under 13.
- Requires parental controls for teen direct messaging without weakening encryption.
- Limits market research on known minors.
- Requires protective communication, purchase, and time controls in online games.
- Requires chatbot identity, crisis-resource, break, and harm-prevention policies.
- Orders federal social-media, fentanyl, safety-tool, and chatbot studies.
- Creates national education campaigns and a five-year safety partnership.
- Authorizes FTC and State civil enforcement.
- Centralizes constitutional review in the D.C. Circuit.
- Protects speech, prevention resources, encryption, privacy, section 230, and COPPA.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a comprehensive federal online-safety regime for minors by requiring age checks on pornography-focused platforms; safety defaults, parental tools, audits, messaging limits, and research restrictions on covered platforms; controls for online games and consumer chatbots; federal studies and education; and FTC plus State enforcement subject to speech, privacy, encryption, and judicial-review limits.
Key Policy Areas
Online Child Safety, Social Media Regulation, Consumer Data Privacy, Age Verification, Artificial Intelligence, Online Gaming, Consumer Protection, Mental Health Research
Primary Purpose
Creates a comprehensive federal online-safety regime for minors by requiring age checks on pornography-focused platforms; safety defaults, parental tools, audits, messaging limits, and research restrictions on covered platforms; controls for online games and consumer chatbots; federal studies and education; and FTC plus State enforcement subject to speech, privacy, encryption, and judicial-review limits.
Policy Domains
Sections 2 through 604 online-platform, messaging, gaming, chatbot, research, education, enforcement, review, and savings provisions
Identified Gains
- Minors exposed to sexual material online
- Minors facing exploitative online contact
- Minors affected by compulsive platform design
- Children protected from direct messaging
- Teens using parent-managed messaging controls
- Minor gamers receiving communication safeguards
- Minor chatbot users receiving crisis resources
- Parents managing online safety controls
- Encrypted-communication users
- Schools using federal safety education
- Researchers studying online mental health
Identified Costs
- Pornography-focused platform providers
- Age-verification contractors
- Covered social-platform providers
- Independent platform auditors
- Direct-messaging platform providers
- Online video-game providers
- Consumer chatbot providers
- Federal Trade Commission staff
- Federal health-agency researchers
- Commerce Department partnership staff
- State consumer-protection enforcers
- Federal courts hearing Act cases
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4302)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4280-4296)
Mr. Guthrie moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, Commerce Department partnership staff, Congressional drug-policy committees
Positive-direction: Congressional drug-policy committees, Congressional mental-health policymakers, Congressional online-safety committees, Congressional online-safety policymakers, Federal Trade Commission defending the Act, Federal Trade Commission enforcement planners, Federal mental-health policymakers, Federally recognized Tribes treated as States, House Energy and Commerce Committee, Senate Commerce Committee, Senate HELP Committee, Territorial governments treated as States
Negative-direction: Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, Commerce Department partnership staff, Drug Enforcement Administration experts, Federal Trade Commission audit reviewers, Federal Trade Commission campaign staff, Federal Trade Commission campaign-report staff, Federal Trade Commission chatbot enforcers, Federal Trade Commission chatbot-policy reviewers, Federal Trade Commission consent enforcers, Federal Trade Commission consultation staff, Federal Trade Commission coverage analysts, Federal Trade Commission coverage reviewers, Federal Trade Commission education developers, Federal Trade Commission education planners, Federal Trade Commission education staff, Federal Trade Commission enforcement staff, Federal Trade Commission fentanyl-report staff, Federal Trade Commission gaming-rule analysts, Federal Trade Commission harm-policy enforcers, Federal Trade Commission industry-review staff, Federal Trade Commission research-practice enforcers, Federal Trade Commission response-time enforcers, Federal Trade Commission social-media researchers, Federal Trade Commission study staff, Food and Drug Administration experts, Government Accountability Office evaluators, National Institutes of Health consultation staff, National Institutes of Health report writers, National Institutes of Health study staff
Adult users relying on encrypted messaging, App-store compliance analysts, COPPA-compliant platforms consolidating notices
Positive-direction: Adult users relying on encrypted messaging, COPPA-compliant platforms consolidating notices, Chatbot providers facing conflict preemption, Chatbot providers preserving educational access, Chatbot safety researchers using study results, Covered platforms avoiding a KOSA age gate, Covered platforms facing conflict preemption, Covered platforms facing federal research rules, Covered platforms facing uniform federal rules, Cryptography experts advising the FTC, Encrypted-communication service providers, Minor chatbot users receiving AI identity notice, Minor users opting out of personalized recommendations, Minor users relying on encrypted messaging, Online platforms using the safety playbook, Platforms retaining section 230 protections, Technologists advising the chatbot study, Third-party online-safety tool providers
Negative-direction: Chatbot interface developers, Chatbot safety-policy teams, Consumer chatbot developers, Consumer chatbot providers, Covered platforms funding annual audits, Covered providers facing civil remedies, Covered-platform compliance teams, Covered-platform consent-system teams, Covered-platform interface teams, Covered-platform legal teams, Covered-platform safety responders, Covered-platform trust teams, Personalized-recommendation operators, Platform account-system operators, Platform electronic-contact staff, Platform engineers providing systems access, Platform recommendation-system operators, Pornography-focused platform providers, Social-media platforms covered by federal studies, Social-media platforms meeting the coverage test, Social-media platforms supplying study evidence, Social-media trust teams supplying evidence, User-generated content platforms, Verification-data security teams
Local governments joining the safety campaign, Local governments regulating platform age checks, Local lawmakers considering conflicting KOSA rules
Positive-direction: State attorneys general bringing KIDS Act cases
Negative-direction: Local governments regulating platform age checks, Local lawmakers considering conflicting KOSA rules, Local lawmakers considering conflicting chatbot rules, Local lawmakers regulating game safeguards, Local lawmakers regulating minor messaging, Local lawmakers regulating minor research, State lawmakers considering conflicting KOSA rules, State lawmakers considering conflicting chatbot rules, State lawmakers regulating game safeguards, State lawmakers regulating minor messaging, State lawmakers regulating minor research, State legislatures regulating platform age checks
Families seeking evidence on chatbot safety, Families using federal chatbot evidence, Parents advising on safety tools
Children under 13 receiving stricter defaults, Minor internet users receiving safety education, Minor users benefiting from evaluated tools
Consumer-privacy specialists, Minor profile holders, Minor users protecting communication privacy
Mental-health organizations publishing resources, Minor chatbot users in extended sessions, Minor chatbot users seeking mitigation resources
Constitutional litigants challenging discrete provisions, Platform compliance counsel, Platforms filing facial constitutional challenges
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "dea"
- → Drug Enforcement Administration contributing fentanyl-access expertise
- "ftc"
- → Federal Trade Commission administering consultation, education, reporting, and enforcement
- "gao"
- → Government Accountability Office evaluating age-verification effectiveness and effects
- "parents"
- → Adults legally authorized to manage minor accounts and consent to controls
- "auditors"
- → Independent third parties conducting annual covered-platform audits
- "commerce"
- → Commerce Secretary and Kids Internet Safety Partnership staff
- "child_users"
- → Users under age 13 subject to stricter messaging and parental-control defaults
- "minor_users"
- → Users under age 17 receiving protections, controls, notices, and education
- "federal_courts"
- → Federal district courts and the D.C. Circuit hearing enforcement or constitutional cases
- "game_providers"
- → Digital game distributors and networks providing communication safeguards
- "adult_platforms"
- → Pornography-focused platforms required to verify age and protect verification data
- "health_agencies"
- → HHS, SAMHSA, FDA, NIH, and NIMH officials conducting studies and consultation
- "state_enforcers"
- → State attorneys general and authorized State officials bringing civil actions
- "chatbot_providers"
- → Businesses providing consumer chatbots directly to known minor users
- "covered_platforms"
- → Interactive user-content platforms providing minor safeguards, parental tools, notices, and audits
- "verification_vendors"
- → Third parties supplying age-verification systems and securing verification data
Note: {'scope_ids': ['kids_online_safety'], 'description': 'The Act imposes strong platform duties while expressly rejecting a general duty of care, preserving deliberate searches and prevention resources, avoiding a KOSA age-gating mandate, protecting strong encryption and section 230, minimizing age-verification data, and preempting only overlapping or conflicting State rules while retaining general consumer, tort, contract, product-liability, and criminal law.'}
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
An individual under age 13 for the Kids Online Safety and direct-messaging provisions.
An individual under age 17 for the Act's general platform rules; certain incorporated criminal-law terms use their own statutory definition.
Actual knowledge or action in willful disregard.
A platform feature encouraging more frequent or longer minor use, including infinite scroll, autoplay, use-based rewards, alerts, badges, appearance filters, and personalized recommendations.
A business providing a consumer chatbot directly through a website, app, or other online means, excluding a service whose chat function is merely incidental to its primary purpose.
A game user whom the provider knows is a minor.
A feature automatically making a communication permanently inaccessible after a set time, viewing, or leaving the interface, excluding ordinary manual deletion and transient technical caching.
A public interactive service primarily sharing user-generated content, using engagement design features and personal information for advertising, marketing, or recommendations.
A public platform knowingly offering sexual material harmful to minors where that material exceeds one-third of available content.
A minimally supervised automated system suggesting, promoting, or ranking content using personal information, excluding systems based only on language, locality, or age.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology