HR7664-119

In Committee

State Partnerships to Enhance Removal of Criminal Aliens Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 24, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The State Partnerships to Enhance Removal of Criminal Aliens Act lets DHS, in coordination with the Attorney General, contract with a state to use qualified state-employed lawyers as Office of the Principal Legal Advisor counsel in specified immigration-removal proceedings. The state pays the lawyers' costs.

Each lawyer must be licensed, trained, knowledgeable about federal immigration law, and covered by a written agreement defining duties, duration, and federal supervision. State counsel have no independent prosecutorial or policymaking discretion and remain under DHS direction. They may use federal property under the agreement. Their service cannot displace a federal employee. They generally are not federal employees, except for specified injury-compensation and tort-claim purposes, but are treated as acting under color of federal authority for civil liability and immunity.

Covered cases include certain expedited proceedings for people held in correctional facilities in the participating state and regular removal proceedings when inadmissibility, deportability, or eligibility for relief may be affected by a state-law violation.

The bill separately broadens “aggravated felony” throughout immigration law. It expands drug offenses to include state, local, or tribal substances even when not federally controlled; adds firearms straw purchasing and trafficking, child pornography, broad violence, assault, battery, robbery, burglary, theft, document, illegal-entry or reentry, war-crimes, torture, genocide, and child-soldier offenses; and covers conspiracies, attempts, solicitation, aiding, and similar participation.

Most broadly, the definition adds any offense classified as a felony by the convicting jurisdiction or punishable by more than one year, even if not otherwise listed. The bill adds aggravated felonies as a ground of criminal inadmissibility, broadens expedited-removal eligibility to criminal grounds under section 237(a)(2), and makes every aggravated felony a particularly serious crime for withholding purposes without the existing five-year aggregate-sentence threshold. Officials may also treat a non-aggravated-felony conviction as particularly serious and may jointly designate additional crimes by regulation.

The bill broadens the criminal-removal jurisdiction bar and applies the changes to offenses committed and removal proceedings begun before, on, or after enactment. A severability clause preserves unaffected provisions and applications if any part is held unconstitutional.

Who Benefits and How

DHS removal counsel programs gain state-funded attorneys for covered cases. Federal immigration prosecutors may process more correctional-facility and state-conviction cases without displacing current federal employees. Participating states gain a formal channel to assign their lawyers to federal removal litigation. State attorneys receive specified federal injury, tort, liability, and immunity treatment while acting under an agreement. Federal enforcement officials gain broader conviction categories and rulemaking authority.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Participating states pay attorney salaries, training, supervision coordination, and litigation costs. State attorneys must follow federal law and DHS direction without independent discretion. DHS supervisors must certify qualifications and manage each agreement. Noncitizens with a wide range of past or future convictions face increased inadmissibility, removal, asylum or withholding barriers, expedited procedures, and reduced judicial review, including people already in pending proceedings. Immigration judges, defense counsel, prosecutors, and courts must apply broad conduct-based, state-law, foreign-law, and retroactive definitions.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes state-funded lawyers to represent DHS in specified removal proceedings.
  • Requires federal training, written duties, DHS supervision, and no independent discretion.
  • Protects existing federal jobs from displacement.
  • Provides specified federal injury, tort, liability, and immunity treatment.
  • Expands aggravated-felony drug, violence, theft, firearms, document, and international-crime categories.
  • Adds a general catchall for any felony or offense punishable by more than one year.
  • Adds aggravated felonies as a criminal inadmissibility ground.
  • Expands expedited removal and particularly-serious-crime treatment.
  • Broadens rulemaking authority and limits on judicial review.
  • Applies the changes to pre-enactment offenses and proceedings.
  • Preserves unaffected provisions after a constitutional holding.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Allows state-funded, federally supervised state attorneys to represent DHS in specified removal proceedings and retroactively expands the immigration-law aggravated-felony definition, inadmissibility, expedited removal, particularly-serious-crime treatment, and limits on judicial review.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration Removal, State-Federal Enforcement Partnerships, Aggravated Felonies, Criminal Inadmissibility, Asylum and Withholding Bars, Immigration Judicial Review

Primary Purpose

Allows state-funded, federally supervised state attorneys to represent DHS in specified removal proceedings and retroactively expands the immigration-law aggravated-felony definition, inadmissibility, expedited removal, particularly-serious-crime treatment, and limits on judicial review.

Policy Domains

Immigration Removal State-Federal Enforcement Partnerships Aggravated Felonies Criminal Inadmissibility Asylum and Withholding Bars Immigration Judicial Review

Section 2 state counsel agreements for removal proceedings

Identified Gains
  • DHS removal counsel programs
  • Federal OPLA attorneys protected from displacement
  • Participating state immigration-enforcement programs
  • State attorneys receiving federal liability treatment
  • Correctional facilities coordinating removal cases
  • Federal immigration case-management programs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS removal counsel programs:
Federal immigration case-management programs:
Correctional facilities coordinating removal cases:
Federal OPLA attorneys protected from displacement:
Participating state immigration-enforcement programs:
State attorneys receiving federal liability treatment:
Identified Costs
  • Participating state government budgets
  • State attorneys performing removal litigation
  • State attorney training programs
  • DHS counsel-supervision staff
  • DHS agreement-drafting staff
  • Noncitizens in correctional-facility proceedings
  • Noncitizens with state-law convictions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS agreement-drafting staff:
DHS counsel-supervision staff:
State attorney training programs:
Noncitizens with state-law convictions:
Participating state government budgets:
State attorneys performing removal litigation:
Noncitizens in correctional-facility proceedings:

Section 3 aggravated-felony and removal consequences

Identified Gains
  • DHS criminal-removal programs
  • Federal immigration prosecutors
  • State officials referring criminal convictions
  • Federal correctional removal coordinators
  • State correctional removal coordinators
  • Local correctional removal coordinators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS criminal-removal programs:
Federal immigration prosecutors:
Local correctional removal coordinators:
State correctional removal coordinators:
Federal correctional removal coordinators:
State officials referring criminal convictions:
Identified Costs
  • Noncitizens convicted of one-year felonies
  • Noncitizens convicted under state drug laws
  • Noncitizens with pre-enactment convictions
  • Asylum applicants with criminal convictions
  • Withholding applicants with aggravated felonies
  • Noncitizens seeking judicial review
  • Immigration defense attorneys
  • Immigration judges applying conduct-based definitions
  • DHS aggravated-felony rulemaking staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Immigration defense attorneys:
Noncitizens seeking judicial review:
DHS aggravated-felony rulemaking staff:
Noncitizens convicted of one-year felonies:
Noncitizens with pre-enactment convictions:
Asylum applicants with criminal convictions:
Noncitizens convicted under state drug laws:
Withholding applicants with aggravated felonies:
Immigration judges applying conduct-based definitions:

Section 4 severability

Identified Gains
  • DHS attorneys relying on surviving provisions
  • State counsel relying on surviving agreements
  • Immigration courts applying unaffected categories
  • Federal courts applying unaffected provisions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS attorneys relying on surviving provisions:
Federal courts applying unaffected provisions:
State counsel relying on surviving agreements:
Immigration courts applying unaffected categories:
Identified Costs
  • Noncitizens challenging surviving provisions
  • Immigration constitutional-litigation counsel
  • Federal judges conducting severability analysis
  • Immigration judges tracking surviving applications
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Noncitizens challenging surviving provisions:
Immigration constitutional-litigation counsel:
Federal judges conducting severability analysis:
Immigration judges tracking surviving applications:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 24, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 24, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 24, 2026

Mr. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
11 mentions across 3 clauses
+5 positive -6 negative

DHS aggravated-felony rulemaking staff, DHS agreement-drafting staff, DHS attorneys relying on surviving provisions

Positive-direction: DHS attorneys relying on surviving provisions, DHS criminal-removal programs, DHS removal counsel programs, Federal OPLA attorneys protected from displacement, Federal immigration prosecutors

Negative-direction: DHS aggravated-felony rulemaking staff, DHS agreement-drafting staff, DHS counsel-supervision staff, Federal judges conducting severability analysis, Immigration judges applying conduct-based definitions, Immigration judges tracking surviving applications

General Public
11 mentions across 3 clauses
-11 negative

Asylum applicants with criminal convictions, Noncitizens challenging surviving provisions, Noncitizens convicted of broad theft offenses

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative ~1 mixed

Participating state government budgets, Participating state immigration-enforcement programs, State attorney training programs

Positive-direction: State counsel relying on surviving agreements, State officials referring criminal convictions

Negative-direction: Participating state government budgets, State attorney training programs

Professional Services
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ~1 mixed

Immigration defense attorneys, State attorneys performing removal litigation, State attorneys receiving federal liability treatment

Positive-direction: State attorneys receiving federal liability treatment

Negative-direction: Immigration defense attorneys

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Removal State-Federal Enforcement Partnerships Government Counsel
Actor Mappings
"counsel"
→ Qualified licensed state attorney
"partner"
→ Participating state
"respondent"
→ Noncitizen in a covered removal proceeding
"coordinator"
→ Attorney General
"federal_principal"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
Domains
Aggravated Felonies Criminal Inadmissibility Asylum and Withholding Bars Immigration Judicial Review
Actor Mappings
"subject"
→ Noncitizen convicted of a newly covered offense
"defender"
→ Immigration defense attorney
"rulemaker"
→ Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security
"prosecutor"
→ DHS removal counsel
"adjudicator"
→ Immigration judge or reviewing court
Domains
Severability Constitutional Review
Actor Mappings
"enforcer"
→ DHS attorney relying on a surviving provision
"reviewer"
→ Court reviewing constitutionality
"challenger"
→ Person challenging a provision or application

Note: {'scope_ids': ['state_removal_counsel'], 'description': 'State attorneys may perform federal counsel functions at state expense and receive specified federal liability treatment, but remain state employees, cannot displace federal staff, and have no independent prosecutorial or policymaking discretion.'}

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"state removal counsel" §state_counsel

A licensed state officer or employee whom DHS finds qualified, trains and supervises under a written agreement, and who exercises no independent prosecutorial or policy discretion.

"temporal application" §retroactive_rule

Application to offenses committed and removal proceedings commenced before, on, or after enactment.

"covered removal proceedings" §covered_proceedings

Specified section 238 cases involving correctional-facility detainees and section 240 cases in which a state-law violation affects removability, inadmissibility, or immigration relief.

"general aggravated-felony catchall" §aggravated_felony_catchall

Any otherwise unlisted offense classified as a felony by the convicting jurisdiction or punishable by a maximum term exceeding one year.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology